1996-02-08 - Re: POTP gets good press

Header Data

From: Don <don@cs.byu.edu>
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: 02eb7dbb3e56974b4d103ccb448a8eb277bc5e6f479a32eeacabea83f5dcb310
Message ID: <ML-2.0.823773937.9124.don@wero.cs.byu.edu>
Reply To: <199602080009.RAA16512@taussky.cs.colorado.edu>
UTC Datetime: 1996-02-08 10:35:43 UTC
Raw Date: Thu, 8 Feb 1996 18:35:43 +0800

Raw message

From: Don <don@cs.byu.edu>
Date: Thu, 8 Feb 1996 18:35:43 +0800
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Re: POTP gets good press
In-Reply-To: <199602080009.RAA16512@taussky.cs.colorado.edu>
Message-ID: <ML-2.0.823773937.9124.don@wero.cs.byu.edu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


bryce@colorado.edu sez:

> "Synchronized Random Key Generation", which shows a single
> sender and multiple recipients transmitting securely
> *without* having to do any key management!  Yee haw!

You mean you don't have this capability? Gee, I've had this for months,
ever since the mother ship^H^H^H^Hmy mother gave me the proprietary program.

*sigh* Cypherpunks teach. I think we'd better brace for this, cuz most of
the important code is already written. (PGP 3.0 and PGP stealth people, this
doesn't apply, and definately any end-to-end stuff is needed)

Unfortunately, you can't set up a CGI counter to tick off the number of time
encryption saved your data, not to mention your butt, but it would sure make
good PR if you could.

Don





Thread