1996-02-08 - Re: POTP gets good press

Header Data

From: Simon Spero <ses@tipper.oit.unc.edu>
To: bryce@colorado.edu
Message Hash: 5172c6e1aa38bd601edb0ada77917fa0377556b2cf55384fe4f99720e78c1fcc
Message ID: <Pine.SOL.3.91.960207143933.2562E-100000@chivalry>
Reply To: <199602072228.PAA21832@nagina.cs.colorado.edu>
UTC Datetime: 1996-02-08 02:45:57 UTC
Raw Date: Thu, 8 Feb 1996 10:45:57 +0800

Raw message

From: Simon Spero <ses@tipper.oit.unc.edu>
Date: Thu, 8 Feb 1996 10:45:57 +0800
To: bryce@colorado.edu
Subject: Re: POTP gets good press
In-Reply-To: <199602072228.PAA21832@nagina.cs.colorado.edu>
Message-ID: <Pine.SOL.3.91.960207143933.2562E-100000@chivalry>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


On Wed, 7 Feb 1996, Bryce wrote:

[original messsage]
> I, Bryce, wrote:
> ...
> > certificate authority which transmits them to multiple
> ...
[reply to my reply] 
> But this would entail a certificate authority to prevent
> MITM attack, right?  The article clearly claimed that POTP

I guess I ought to try and find the article; I took this line in your 
message to suggest that there was such a CA. Could you possibly type in 
the relevant bit of the original article (though I suspect there's not 
much in there anyway)






Thread