1996-02-18 - Re: DES_ono

Header Data

From: dlv@bwalk.dm.com (Dr. Dimitri Vulis)
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: 17ed4d4eb8f016a240a9e99affa4c85cb82a7430bb293788fdd77f5afe588e54
Message ID: <JX7HJD18w165w@bwalk.dm.com>
Reply To: <199602181633.LAA09963@homeport.org>
UTC Datetime: 1996-02-18 17:16:31 UTC
Raw Date: Mon, 19 Feb 1996 01:16:31 +0800

Raw message

From: dlv@bwalk.dm.com (Dr. Dimitri Vulis)
Date: Mon, 19 Feb 1996 01:16:31 +0800
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Re: DES_ono
In-Reply-To: <199602181633.LAA09963@homeport.org>
Message-ID: <JX7HJD18w165w@bwalk.dm.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


Adam Shostack <adam@homeport.org> writes:
> | Assuming the rumours of the weakness of DES are true, which symmetric
> | encryption algorithms would you recommend which are substantially more
> | secure than DES (and which are obtainable from Internet or commercial
> | sources)?  (It doesn't haver to be exportable).
>
> 	I'd use IDEA or 3DES.  Again, see Schneier.

Or perhaps GOST 28147-89.

---

Dr. Dimitri Vulis
Brighton Beach Boardwalk BBS, Forest Hills, N.Y.: +1-718-261-2013, 14.4Kbps

Thread

• Return to February 1996

• Return to “Adam Shostack <adam@lighthouse.homeport.org>”
• Return to “Andrew Loewenstern <andrew_loewenstern@il.us.swissbank.com>”
• Return to “dlv@bwalk.dm.com (Dr. Dimitri Vulis)”
• Return to “Frank Willoughby <frankw@in.net>”

• Return to ““Mark M.” <markm@voicenet.com>”

• 1996-02-18 (Sun, 18 Feb 1996 14:07:01 +0800) - Re: DES_ono - Frank Willoughby <frankw@in.net>
  • 1996-02-18 (Sun, 18 Feb 1996 23:50:28 +0800) - Re: DES_ono - “Mark M.” <markm@voicenet.com>
  • 1996-02-18 (Mon, 19 Feb 1996 00:47:56 +0800) - Re: DES_ono - Adam Shostack <adam@lighthouse.homeport.org>
    • 1996-02-18 (Mon, 19 Feb 1996 01:16:31 +0800) - Re: DES_ono - dlv@bwalk.dm.com (Dr. Dimitri Vulis)
      • 1996-02-21 (Wed, 21 Feb 1996 13:58:29 +0800) - Re: DES_ono - Andrew Loewenstern <andrew_loewenstern@il.us.swissbank.com>