From: Bruce Baugh <bruce@aracnet.com>
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: 84ef30b420dbc9649d5b7a8c05e6aa294b161893120e72b040a3421219a5000d
Message ID: <2.2.32.19960219191757.006d763c@mail.aracnet.com>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1996-02-19 20:28:28 UTC
Raw Date: Tue, 20 Feb 1996 04:28:28 +0800
From: Bruce Baugh <bruce@aracnet.com>
Date: Tue, 20 Feb 1996 04:28:28 +0800
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Remailers not heard from; info?
Message-ID: <2.2.32.19960219191757.006d763c@mail.aracnet.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
I'm curious if anyone knows anything about the status of the following type
I remailers.
NOT HEARD FROM IN MY JANUARY OR FEBRUARY TESTS
amnesia@chardos.connix.com
NOT HEARD FROM IN MY FEBRUARY TESTS
pamphlet@idiom.com
remail@c2.org
remailer@bi-node.zerberus.de
robo@c2.org
And as long as I'm asking questions :-), I see that some remailers
(hfinney@shell.portal.com, hal@alumni.caltech.edu, homer@rahul.net) preserve
subject lines while others do not. Is this a readily settable option? If so,
I'd like to commend it to other remailer operators. If not, I'd be
interested in getting some sense of how difficult a hack it is.
--
Bruce Baugh
bruce@aracnet.com
http://www.aracnet.com/~bruce
Return to February 1996
Return to “lmccarth@cs.umass.edu”