From: lmccarth@cs.umass.edu
Date: Tue, 20 Feb 1996 18:02:18 +0800
To: cypherpunks@toad.com (Cypherpunks Mailing List)
Subject: Re: Remailers not heard from; info?
In-Reply-To: <2.2.32.19960219191757.006d763c@mail.aracnet.com>
Message-ID: <199602200943.EAA06099@thor.cs.umass.edu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


Bruce Baugh writes:
> And as long as I'm asking questions :-), I see that some remailers
> (hfinney@shell.portal.com, hal@alumni.caltech.edu, homer@rahul.net) preserve
> subject lines while others do not. Is this a readily settable option? If so,
> I'd like to commend it to other remailer operators. If not, I'd be
> interested in getting some sense of how difficult a hack it is.

(Raph has authoritatively covered the space of deployed options already.)

Writing code to keep or drop particular headers is trivial. Getting everyone
who runs a remailer to deploy that code tends to be much harder.

-Lewis	"You're always disappointed, nothing seems to keep you high -- drive 
	your bargains, push your papers, win your medals, fuck your strangers;
	don't it leave you on the empty side ?"  (Joni Mitchell, 1972)