From: Harold Gabel <hgabel@vertex.ucls.uchicago.edu>
Date: Fri, 9 Feb 1996 00:44:06 +0800
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Re: stealth PGP?
In-Reply-To: <ML-2.0.823780986.7349.don@wero.cs.byu.edu>
Message-ID: <Pine.SOL.3.91.960208095752.18958B-100000@vertex.ucls.uchicago.edu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----

On Thu, 8 Feb 1996, Don wrote:
{snip}
> My feeling is that once stealth PGP is out, there's *no*way* Congress could
> get away with legislating away the privacy and security that would provide.
{snip}
What will stealth PGP be?  Will it use RSA?

Also, how flawed is MIT pgp?  Is it really worth using international
versions (i.e. ones written out of the USA which don't use RSA)?  Does
the Gov't have some complaint about said versions?

Harold



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: 2.6.2
Comment: Processed by mkpgp: EAT THIS MAIL FILTERS!!!

iQEVAwUBMRoepgnQEIDDS8rVAQEhNgf9G5hgOFFaO6o6yoTHi5gxYrMaHx9I3ezL
k23pwW5gkSqKDQxTGnwoO+8WNIdyeUul0YOUMS+hDFgnMz6hbIRfe0aC/dDITY3B
JGC9RvOZjmhCAtDLgWlCksz7ZovBifsJuf6UjFNIXZ9reb9OCADmzBzDOQZWabmn
TYZVzPv4kBqotWig9il3aufgzyPjXZguHwHFvBxVBttUFWxE733SK+zhOgqn4eeD
IvYSUr8ebGle7rRvSEbNZvUIrln2soOpemIUgSqc+/5/6l2qvllc2MflIfV4OIhi
B+gVGjJcdv+XVpK0w6y3esLMeN3Nw7QR6m/8GPFSJWY4DyfzuaWmiQ==
=87NH
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----