1996-02-08 - Re: Likely application for high-bandwidth proxies (fwd)

Header Data

From: lmccarth@cs.umass.edu
To: cypherpunks@toad.com (Cypherpunks Mailing List)
Message Hash: c94c97905cd8408f420af00bf0bdb8630449a14e301bccddace0ef3b951dc317
Message ID: <199602060747.CAA10602@opine.cs.umass.edu>
Reply To: <Pine.BSD.3.91.960206065604.5857H-100000@usr6.primenet.com>
UTC Datetime: 1996-02-08 01:20:37 UTC
Raw Date: Thu, 8 Feb 1996 09:20:37 +0800

Raw message

From: lmccarth@cs.umass.edu
Date: Thu, 8 Feb 1996 09:20:37 +0800
To: cypherpunks@toad.com (Cypherpunks Mailing List)
Subject: Re: Likely application for high-bandwidth proxies (fwd)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSD.3.91.960206065604.5857H-100000@usr6.primenet.com>
Message-ID: <199602060747.CAA10602@opine.cs.umass.edu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


attila writes:
> 	on a little more serious point; the use of multiple high
>     bandwidth proxies is fast becoming essential 
[...]
>     The only clinker is 
>     the big sites are startig to require registration with legal warnings 
>     --next of course is payment and they want a credit card --not a check
>     or cybercash --a credit card for open debit. 

This makes it harder for transitory proxies, but not for fairly permanent
ones, I suspect. An outfit like C2 could presumably register with a corporate
credit card. Its proxy then carries connections paid-as-you-go with e$, or
paid in chunks in advance with a check.

-Lewis	"Despite all my rage, I am still just a rat in a cage" -Smashing P'kins





Thread