1996-03-28 - Re: Edited Edupage, 24 March 1996

Header Data

From: roy@sendai.cybrspc.mn.org (Roy M. Silvernail)
To: EALLENSMITH@ocelot.Rutgers.EDU (E. ALLEN SMITH)
Message Hash: 65beb49f66d59f852218d6a17aad1709fcf7745a8fc3c1c2639cab8a5483f220
Message ID: <960327.172831.2j4.rnr.w165w@sendai.cybrspc.mn.org>
Reply To: <01I2T0RRDGQO8ZDZIP@mbcl.rutgers.edu>
UTC Datetime: 1996-03-28 23:58:07 UTC
Raw Date: Fri, 29 Mar 1996 07:58:07 +0800

Raw message

From: roy@sendai.cybrspc.mn.org (Roy M. Silvernail)
Date: Fri, 29 Mar 1996 07:58:07 +0800
To: EALLENSMITH@ocelot.Rutgers.EDU (E. ALLEN SMITH)
Subject: Re: Edited Edupage, 24 March 1996
In-Reply-To: <01I2T0RRDGQO8ZDZIP@mbcl.rutgers.edu>
Message-ID: <960327.172831.2j4.rnr.w165w@sendai.cybrspc.mn.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----

In list.cypherpunks, EALLENSMITH@mbcl.rutgers.edu writes:

> Subj:   Edupage, 24 March 1996

>>NETSCAPE TO GET IN ON THE PHONE-BY-INTERNET ACTION

>         Any possibility that Netscape might build in some form of
> cryptography? I realize ITAR rules would make this problematic, but
> perhaps some sort of out-of-country deal for putting in the hooks
> for PGPhone could be done.

Seems like SSL could work for this.
- -- 
           Roy M. Silvernail     [ ]      roy@cybrspc.mn.org
PGP Public Key fingerprint =  31 86 EC B9 DB 76 A7 54  13 0B 6A 6B CC 09 18 B6
                Key available from pubkey@cybrspc.mn.org

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: 2.6.2

iQCVAwUBMVnQGxvikii9febJAQFcxAP/TkEuQ9lPx/USyQjptvmL8FvM+nMvZrn/
m1tS7nYJ7SR7DQWl5uZM8Y+MRPZeDsmqvPNT13auS7QVJYDbM58Jp35khbJ/jdND
hWC/H4h/yyBt/GVoFgByLI/ORletMW5p9dEuVFXAY0BCFuB17yvdhr0UkOcaTPiZ
ciSWevXjh1I=
=L3PH
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----





Thread