1996-04-27 - Re: Golden Key Campaign

Header Data

From: sameer@c2.org
To: perry@piermont.com
Message Hash: 29ed3492a2bf2952f85dbbc16091824f7b34601af7ed2252e61c4288039bdaef
Message ID: <199604270039.RAA09438@atropos.c2.org>
Reply To: <199604270019.UAA01587@jekyll.piermont.com>
UTC Datetime: 1996-04-27 08:32:02 UTC
Raw Date: Sat, 27 Apr 1996 16:32:02 +0800

Raw message

From: sameer@c2.org
Date: Sat, 27 Apr 1996 16:32:02 +0800
To: perry@piermont.com
Subject: Re: Golden Key Campaign
In-Reply-To: <199604270019.UAA01587@jekyll.piermont.com>
Message-ID: <199604270039.RAA09438@atropos.c2.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


	What do you mean by "per se"? 

	That it might be covered by the Stanford patents? (Those are
the ones that allegedly cover all public-key, right?)


> 
> David Mazieres writes:
> > Isn't Rabin's algorithm patented, too?
> 
> There is no patent on Rabin per se.
> 
> .pm
> 


-- 
Sameer Parekh					Voice:   510-601-9777x3
Community ConneXion, Inc.			FAX:     510-601-9734
The Internet Privacy Provider			Dialin:  510-658-6376
http://www.c2.net/ (or login as "guest")		sameer@c2.net

Thread

• Return to April 1996

• Return to “David Mazieres <dm@amsterdam.lcs.mit.edu>”
• Return to “frantz@netcom.com (Bill Frantz)”
• Return to ““Perry E. Metzger” <perry@piermont.com>”

• Return to “sameer@c2.org”

• 1996-04-25 (Thu, 25 Apr 1996 11:10:22 -0700 (PDT)) - Re: Golden Key Campaign - frantz@netcom.com (Bill Frantz)
  • 1996-04-25 (Thu, 25 Apr 1996 12:27:48 -0700 (PDT)) - Re: Golden Key Campaign - “Perry E. Metzger” <perry@piermont.com>
  • 1996-04-27 (Sat, 27 Apr 1996 14:03:35 +0800) - Re: Golden Key Campaign - David Mazieres <dm@amsterdam.lcs.mit.edu>
    • 1996-04-27 (Sat, 27 Apr 1996 15:21:12 +0800) - Re: Golden Key Campaign - “Perry E. Metzger” <perry@piermont.com>
      • 1996-04-27 (Sat, 27 Apr 1996 16:32:02 +0800) - Re: Golden Key Campaign - sameer@c2.org
        • 1996-04-27 (Sat, 27 Apr 1996 16:27:10 +0800) - Re: Golden Key Campaign - “Perry E. Metzger” <perry@piermont.com>