1996-04-25 - Re: Golden Key Campaign

Header Data

From: “Perry E. Metzger” <perry@piermont.com>
To: frantz@netcom.com (Bill Frantz)
Message Hash: bd6aa5e31c55ae48c19d0ae54a09dac9192f043fa2b48045dcfd672709777d4f
Message ID: <199604251927.PAA27960@jekyll.piermont.com>
Reply To: <199604251810.LAA17469@netcom9.netcom.com>
UTC Datetime: 1996-04-25 19:27:48 UTC
Raw Date: Thu, 25 Apr 1996 12:27:48 -0700 (PDT)

Raw message

From: "Perry E. Metzger" <perry@piermont.com>
Date: Thu, 25 Apr 1996 12:27:48 -0700 (PDT)
To: frantz@netcom.com (Bill Frantz)
Subject: Re: Golden Key Campaign
In-Reply-To: <199604251810.LAA17469@netcom9.netcom.com>
Message-ID: <199604251927.PAA27960@jekyll.piermont.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain



Bill Frantz writes:
> I will add to Bill's list:
> 
> 7) RSA is the best known and vetted of the Public Key algorithms.

Nota at all, Mr. Frantz. There are no proofs of security associated
with RSA. Rabin has excellent proofs that breaking a message is
strictly equivalent to factoring.

.pm

Thread

• Return to April 1996

• Return to “David Mazieres <dm@amsterdam.lcs.mit.edu>”
• Return to “frantz@netcom.com (Bill Frantz)”
• Return to ““Perry E. Metzger” <perry@piermont.com>”

• Return to “sameer@c2.org”

• 1996-04-25 (Thu, 25 Apr 1996 11:10:22 -0700 (PDT)) - Re: Golden Key Campaign - frantz@netcom.com (Bill Frantz)
  • 1996-04-25 (Thu, 25 Apr 1996 12:27:48 -0700 (PDT)) - Re: Golden Key Campaign - “Perry E. Metzger” <perry@piermont.com>
  • 1996-04-27 (Sat, 27 Apr 1996 14:03:35 +0800) - Re: Golden Key Campaign - David Mazieres <dm@amsterdam.lcs.mit.edu>
    • 1996-04-27 (Sat, 27 Apr 1996 15:21:12 +0800) - Re: Golden Key Campaign - “Perry E. Metzger” <perry@piermont.com>
      • 1996-04-27 (Sat, 27 Apr 1996 16:32:02 +0800) - Re: Golden Key Campaign - sameer@c2.org
        • 1996-04-27 (Sat, 27 Apr 1996 16:27:10 +0800) - Re: Golden Key Campaign - “Perry E. Metzger” <perry@piermont.com>