1996-04-26 - Re: [NOISE] What is “laser material”?

Header Data

From: Simon Spero <ses@tipper.oit.unc.edu>
To: Bill Frantz <frantz@netcom.com>
Message Hash: 374b724aa18b9bb09c8fc25b9d82f8fb1d7b3026f3c73ded01d8be23f5c05392
Message ID: <Pine.SOL.3.91.960425224319.23458D-100000@chivalry>
Reply To: <199604260403.VAA23917@netcom9.netcom.com>
UTC Datetime: 1996-04-26 11:49:16 UTC
Raw Date: Fri, 26 Apr 1996 19:49:16 +0800

Raw message

From: Simon Spero <ses@tipper.oit.unc.edu>
Date: Fri, 26 Apr 1996 19:49:16 +0800
To: Bill Frantz <frantz@netcom.com>
Subject: Re: [NOISE] What is "laser material"?
In-Reply-To: <199604260403.VAA23917@netcom9.netcom.com>
Message-ID: <Pine.SOL.3.91.960425224319.23458D-100000@chivalry>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


÷On Thu, 25 Apr 1996, Bill Frantz wrote:
> >...
> >   Nautilus would be beamed from a truck capable of firing 50
> >   shots before requiring more laser material. 
> 
> Does anyone have any idea what "more laser material" means?

I think it's something nasty like a flouride of some kind (I seem to 
remember reading that the biggest problem with anti-missile lasers has 
been stopping them frm disolving the pongos firing it. 

Definitely sounds nice if it works. I've had scuds fired at me and I 
didn't enjoy it :)

---
They say in  online country             So which side are you on boys
There is no middle way                  Which side are you on
You'll either be a Usenet man           Which side are you on boys
Or a thug for the CDA                   Which side are you on?
  National Union of Computer Operatives; Hackers, local 37   APL-CPIO






Thread