1996-04-26 - Re: [NOISE] What is “laser material”?

Header Data

From: Mike McNally <m5@vail.tivoli.com>
To: Bill Frantz <frantz@netcom.com>
Message Hash: e4806e77c5cc28d87a3d51750832ab7341f39f1090450ae592ff1a44e61269a8
Message ID: <3180C174.4DC4@vail.tivoli.com>
Reply To: <199604260403.VAA23917@netcom9.netcom.com>
UTC Datetime: 1996-04-26 20:40:36 UTC
Raw Date: Sat, 27 Apr 1996 04:40:36 +0800

Raw message

From: Mike McNally <m5@vail.tivoli.com>
Date: Sat, 27 Apr 1996 04:40:36 +0800
To: Bill Frantz <frantz@netcom.com>
Subject: Re: [NOISE] What is "laser material"?
In-Reply-To: <199604260403.VAA23917@netcom9.netcom.com>
Message-ID: <3180C174.4DC4@vail.tivoli.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


Bill Frantz wrote:

> >   Moreover, a laser shot costs $3,000, compared to several
> >   million dollars for a missile. Army officials envision the
> >   Nautilus would be beamed from a truck capable of firing 50
> >   shots before requiring more laser material.
> 
> Does anyone have any idea what "more laser material" means?

It's this fluorescent goopy stuff, very sticky and tough to handle; I 
hear it smells *awful* too.  They have to use big compressors to pack
it into the laser tubes.  That's one of the reason lasers require so
much power.

Curiously, the popular novelty product "Silly String" is in fact a 
scaled-down "domestic" version of real laser technology.

______c_____________________________________________________________________
Mike M Nally * Tiv^H^H^H IBM * Austin TX    * pain is inevitable  
       m5@tivoli.com * m101@io.com          *
      <URL:http://www.io.com/~m101>         * suffering is optional





Thread