1996-04-09 - Re: (Fwd) British Study Claims That Photo Credit Cards Don’t Work

Header Data

From: jamesd@echeque.com
To: David Loysen <cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: 593eb863c05b86ae36985f771b8e40fd2f65587f4d8464a14cde91f5e2972998
Message ID: <199604090654.XAA16860@dns2.noc.best.net>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1996-04-09 11:12:03 UTC
Raw Date: Tue, 9 Apr 1996 19:12:03 +0800

Raw message

From: jamesd@echeque.com
Date: Tue, 9 Apr 1996 19:12:03 +0800
To: David Loysen <cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Re: (Fwd) British Study Claims That Photo Credit Cards Don't  Work
Message-ID: <199604090654.XAA16860@dns2.noc.best.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


> > Some thoughts... (er, questions):
> > 1. What are the implications for log-on systems that rely on 
> > recognition of faces (supposedly impossible for hackers to describe 
> > and exploit)?

At 11:19 AM 4/8/96 -0700, David Loysen wrote:
> Does anybody know how well these systems work? 

Yes:  They don't work.

> If I don't shave over the
> weekend will my computer know who I am Monday morning?

Shaving probably will not be a problem, but holding your head at a slightly
different angle, or having slightly different lighting, or combing your
hair differently will screw up the system totally, unless the system has 
radically improved since the last time  I read up on it.
 ---------------------------------------------------------------------
              				|  
We have the right to defend ourselves	|   http://www.jim.com/jamesd/
and our property, because of the kind	|  
of animals that we are. True law	|   James A. Donald
derives from this right, not from the	|  
arbitrary power of the state.		|   jamesd@echeque.com






Thread