1996-05-07 - Re: WWW proxies?

Header Data

From: sameer@c2.org
To: shamrock@netcom.com (Lucky Green)
Message Hash: 4118b1dac69169af31d046ec42accbaedcad5f1274dd020579651690e9764295
Message ID: <199605062058.NAA00289@clotho.c2.org>
Reply To: <v02120d01adb3f9eac27a@[192.0.2.1]>
UTC Datetime: 1996-05-07 06:26:32 UTC
Raw Date: Tue, 7 May 1996 14:26:32 +0800

Raw message

From: sameer@c2.org
Date: Tue, 7 May 1996 14:26:32 +0800
To: shamrock@netcom.com (Lucky Green)
Subject: Re: WWW proxies?
In-Reply-To: <v02120d01adb3f9eac27a@[192.0.2.1]>
Message-ID: <199605062058.NAA00289@clotho.c2.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


> In your evaluation, perhaps. In the mind of every web proxy site? Doubtful.
> 
> In fact, a former client of mine seriously considered offering an
> "anonymous" web proxy for the sole reason to be able to capture the traffic
> stats.

	I will crush other such sites.

-sameer, who will take over the world.





Thread