1996-05-07 - Re: WWW proxies?

Header Data

From: shamrock@netcom.com (Lucky Green)
To: sameer <sameer@c2.org>
Message Hash: c01e1948b46b86f0453fd4161953ccd2fbfe3e49b2edc0da4ad79fa5f4e5cc49
Message ID: <v02120d01adb3f9eac27a@[192.0.2.1]>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1996-05-07 02:49:16 UTC
Raw Date: Tue, 7 May 1996 10:49:16 +0800

Raw message

From: shamrock@netcom.com (Lucky Green)
Date: Tue, 7 May 1996 10:49:16 +0800
To: sameer <sameer@c2.org>
Subject: Re: WWW proxies?
Message-ID: <v02120d01adb3f9eac27a@[192.0.2.1]>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


At 11:31 5/6/96, sameer wrote:
>> site, the commercial value of the information that could be gained by
>> logging traffic at the site is tremendous.
>
>        The commercial value of being honest is greater.

In your evaluation, perhaps. In the mind of every web proxy site? Doubtful.

In fact, a former client of mine seriously considered offering an
"anonymous" web proxy for the sole reason to be able to capture the traffic
stats.

Disclaimer: My opinions are my own, not those of my employer.

-- Lucky Green <mailto:shamrock@netcom.com>
   PGP encrypted mail preferred.







Thread