1996-05-22 - Re: Bit tax proposal?
Header Data
From: Mike McNally <m5@vail.tivoli.com>
To: “E. ALLEN SMITH” <EALLENSMITH@ocelot.Rutgers.EDU>
Message Hash: 664ae7a2497eb3070cb289c280ffa2f154f2bc109abd45b68ed36ced2e27a143
Message ID: <31A313CA.405D@vail.tivoli.com>
Reply To: <01I4ZMQQODUA8Y5IL9@mbcl.rutgers.edu>
UTC Datetime: 1996-05-22 18:24:43 UTC
Raw Date: Thu, 23 May 1996 02:24:43 +0800
Raw message
From: Mike McNally <m5@vail.tivoli.com>
Date: Thu, 23 May 1996 02:24:43 +0800
To: "E. ALLEN SMITH" <EALLENSMITH@ocelot.Rutgers.EDU>
Subject: Re: Bit tax proposal?
In-Reply-To: <01I4ZMQQODUA8Y5IL9@mbcl.rutgers.edu>
Message-ID: <31A313CA.405D@vail.tivoli.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
E. ALLEN SMITH forwarded:
>
> ... And what about the tax rate itself? Is it too high or not high enough?
> If the tax of .000001 cents per bit yields too much revenue, then it can
> always be adjusted.
ROTFL.
______c_____________________________________________________________________
Mike M Nally * Tiv^H^H^H IBM * Austin TX * pain is inevitable
m5@tivoli.com * m101@io.com *
<URL:http://www.io.com/~m101> * suffering is optional
Thread
Return to May 1996
- Return to “Alan Horowitz <alanh@infi.net>”
- Return to ““E. ALLEN SMITH” <EALLENSMITH@ocelot.Rutgers.EDU>”
Return to “Mike McNally <m5@vail.tivoli.com>”
- 1996-05-22 (Wed, 22 May 1996 20:57:49 +0800) - Bit tax proposal? - “E. ALLEN SMITH” <EALLENSMITH@ocelot.Rutgers.EDU>
- 1996-05-22 (Thu, 23 May 1996 02:24:43 +0800) - Re: Bit tax proposal? - Mike McNally <m5@vail.tivoli.com>
- 1996-05-23 (Thu, 23 May 1996 16:27:02 +0800) - Re: Bit tax proposal? - Alan Horowitz <alanh@infi.net>