1996-05-23 - Re: Bit tax proposal?
Header Data
From: Alan Horowitz <alanh@infi.net>
To: N/A
Message Hash: dfe0c57006efbbf64f073440c4808439485df95c49a10ca975b1654430ef692e
Message ID: <Pine.SV4.3.91.960522224429.8831E-100000@larry.infi.net>
Reply To: <01I4ZMQQODUA8Y5IL9@mbcl.rutgers.edu>
UTC Datetime: 1996-05-23 08:27:02 UTC
Raw Date: Thu, 23 May 1996 16:27:02 +0800
Raw message
From: Alan Horowitz <alanh@infi.net>
Date: Thu, 23 May 1996 16:27:02 +0800
Subject: Re: Bit tax proposal?
In-Reply-To: <01I4ZMQQODUA8Y5IL9@mbcl.rutgers.edu>
Message-ID: <Pine.SV4.3.91.960522224429.8831E-100000@larry.infi.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
<< " Govt has not yet figured out how to tax this new wealth" >>
That is the main reason it came into being. Start taxing it on some
arbitrary basis, and people won't bother creating it.
<< " Proposed is an easily administered" >>
" My convenience as a bureacrat is more important than the convenience
of the people who are creating wealth" >>
Thread
Return to May 1996
- Return to “Alan Horowitz <alanh@infi.net>”
- Return to ““E. ALLEN SMITH” <EALLENSMITH@ocelot.Rutgers.EDU>”
Return to “Mike McNally <m5@vail.tivoli.com>”
- 1996-05-22 (Wed, 22 May 1996 20:57:49 +0800) - Bit tax proposal? - “E. ALLEN SMITH” <EALLENSMITH@ocelot.Rutgers.EDU>
- 1996-05-22 (Thu, 23 May 1996 02:24:43 +0800) - Re: Bit tax proposal? - Mike McNally <m5@vail.tivoli.com>
- 1996-05-23 (Thu, 23 May 1996 16:27:02 +0800) - Re: Bit tax proposal? - Alan Horowitz <alanh@infi.net>