1996-05-10 - Re: Remailer in a box

Header Data

From: “E. ALLEN SMITH” <EALLENSMITH@ocelot.Rutgers.EDU>
To: loki@obscura.com
Message Hash: 7646eb42e127dce2b37d4cd522917c4360bf5cb1919f9f3b357cd3e2b1eb4789
Message ID: <01I4IIMHQ67Y8Y5BAX@mbcl.rutgers.edu>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1996-05-10 18:33:29 UTC
Raw Date: Sat, 11 May 1996 02:33:29 +0800

Raw message

From: "E. ALLEN SMITH" <EALLENSMITH@ocelot.Rutgers.EDU>
Date: Sat, 11 May 1996 02:33:29 +0800
To: loki@obscura.com
Subject: Re: Remailer in a box
Message-ID: <01I4IIMHQ67Y8Y5BAX@mbcl.rutgers.edu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


From:	IN%"loki@obscura.com"  "Lance Cottrell"  9-MAY-1996 18:58:23.21

On Thu, 9 May 1996, E. ALLEN SMITH wrote:

>> 	After taking a look at www.cyberpass.net, I can see why you're
>> encoraging people to use it - about like Sameer encouraging people to use
>> c2.org.

>Guilty

	No problem. Modesty is an overrated virtue.

>I am not pushing the anonymous accounts until my laywer finishes the user 
>agreement for them. It is a bit of a tricky document (Sameer, want a copy 
>when it is done?). The whole site is days away from a complete redesign, 
>so I am not putting much effort into the current interface. Thanks for 
>the suggestions though.

	I suspect that the legal types on cypherpunks would be interested in
seeing it. Quite welcome on the suggestions.

>The >= 18 condition is to cover my butt. Since minors can not be parties 
>to contracts, I have no protection with them as clients. I am only a 
>provider for adults, and they take full responsibility for any children 
>allowed to use the connection. Fuck the CDA, but keep an eye on its claws.

	I see your difficulty. It is an additional one with respect to
anonymous accounts. Hmm... you could put the burden on other ISPs by only
having anonymous accounts via telnet access - and not accepting such from
k12.edu domains. Bit of a limit, though.
	-Allen





Thread