From: Black Unicorn <unicorn@schloss.li>
To: “E. ALLEN SMITH” <EALLENSMITH@ocelot.Rutgers.EDU>
Message Hash: b96cc1681cfbf716f870ef7564d6acc6f9e70d6da5c5631decd5f4522af3440e
Message ID: <Pine.SUN.3.93.960506193901.16554A-100000@polaris.mindport.net>
Reply To: <01I4DYNHXPW28Y583T@mbcl.rutgers.edu>
UTC Datetime: 1996-05-07 07:36:28 UTC
Raw Date: Tue, 7 May 1996 15:36:28 +0800
From: Black Unicorn <unicorn@schloss.li>
Date: Tue, 7 May 1996 15:36:28 +0800
To: "E. ALLEN SMITH" <EALLENSMITH@ocelot.Rutgers.EDU>
Subject: Re: CryptoAnarchy: What's wrong with this picture?
In-Reply-To: <01I4DYNHXPW28Y583T@mbcl.rutgers.edu>
Message-ID: <Pine.SUN.3.93.960506193901.16554A-100000@polaris.mindport.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
On Mon, 6 May 1996, E. ALLEN SMITH wrote:
> On Sun, 28 Apr 1996, jim bell wrote:
>
> [...]
>
> >While strong cryptography is powerful, and secure communications
> >liberating, unplugging the phones would about cripple that 'weapon' for a
> >while. Any group rebelling based only on high technology communication is
> >an extremely vulnerable group, both to widespread denial of service, and
> >more specific 'surgical' attacks. (Motorola stock anyone?)
Watch your attributation. This is my quote.
>
> Wouldn't that partially depend on:
> A. the level of backups - packet radio as a backup for phones,
> for instance... a reason I've been forwarding the stuff on radio to here.
> B. the necessity to the government of keeping what else may
> depend on those phones - the economy - going.
> -Allen
>
---
My preferred and soon to be permanent e-mail address:unicorn@schloss.li
"In fact, had Bancroft not existed, potestas scientiae in usu est
Franklin might have had to invent him." in nihilum nil posse reverti
00B9289C28DC0E55 E16D5378B81E1C96 - Finger for Current Key Information
Opp. Counsel: For all your expert testimony needs: jimbell@pacifier.com
Return to May 1996
Return to ““E. ALLEN SMITH” <EALLENSMITH@ocelot.Rutgers.EDU>”