1996-05-20 - Toastmasters?Incorporating

Header Data

From: remailer@2005.bart.nl (Senator Exon)
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: d3b980aa368b58aef131a7111e348ca344b27883e6de80c2cbdf9774ce746b55
Message ID: <199605200437.GAA20138@spoof.bart.nl>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1996-05-20 09:23:56 UTC
Raw Date: Mon, 20 May 1996 17:23:56 +0800

Raw message

From: remailer@2005.bart.nl (Senator Exon)
Date: Mon, 20 May 1996 17:23:56 +0800
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Toastmasters?Incorporating
Message-ID: <199605200437.GAA20138@spoof.bart.nl>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


How do corporations work, in terms of liability?  If the cost of 
incorporating isn't forbidding, I would think a remailer operator might 
consider incorporating a company, and making the remailer a function of 
that company.  That way, any losses are restricted to the total value of 
the corporation; that is, nothing.  Any flaws?  There must be something 
wrong with it somewhere.

Thanks.

Thread

• Return to May 1996

• Return to “Alan Horowitz <alanh@infi.net>”
• Return to “Black Unicorn <unicorn@schloss.li>”
• Return to “dlv@bwalk.dm.com (Dr. Dimitri Vulis)”
• Return to “qut@netcom.com (Dave Harman)”

• Return to “remailer@2005.bart.nl (Senator Exon)”

• 1996-05-20 (Mon, 20 May 1996 17:23:56 +0800) - Toastmasters?Incorporating - remailer@2005.bart.nl (Senator Exon)
  • 1996-05-20 (Mon, 20 May 1996 23:02:22 +0800) - Re: Incorporating - qut@netcom.com (Dave Harman)
    • 1996-05-21 (Tue, 21 May 1996 16:28:44 +0800) - Re: Incorporating - Alan Horowitz <alanh@infi.net>
  • 1996-05-20 (Tue, 21 May 1996 01:59:30 +0800) - Re: Toastmasters? - Black Unicorn <unicorn@schloss.li>
    • 1996-05-21 (Tue, 21 May 1996 15:29:22 +0800) - Re: Toastmasters? - dlv@bwalk.dm.com (Dr. Dimitri Vulis)
      • 1996-05-21 (Tue, 21 May 1996 16:20:38 +0800) - Re: Toastmasters? - Black Unicorn <unicorn@schloss.li>