From: “Declan B. McCullagh” <declan+@CMU.EDU>
To: EALLENSMITH@ocelot.Rutgers.EDU>
Message Hash: f3dd650e026e2db4e4ca8b9f58fb8819137e94a6d915946dca9006b94cc08648
Message ID: <8ldbhXq00iWT09gHY9@andrew.cmu.edu>
Reply To: <01I53GHKZH1M8Y4Z90@mbcl.rutgers.edu>
UTC Datetime: 1996-05-25 07:38:31 UTC
Raw Date: Sat, 25 May 1996 15:38:31 +0800
From: "Declan B. McCullagh" <declan+@CMU.EDU>
Date: Sat, 25 May 1996 15:38:31 +0800
To: EALLENSMITH@ocelot.Rutgers.EDU>
Subject: Re: Children's Privacy Act
In-Reply-To: <01I53GHKZH1M8Y4Z90@mbcl.rutgers.edu>
Message-ID: <8ldbhXq00iWT09gHY9@andrew.cmu.edu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Excerpts from internet.cypherpunks: 24-May-96 Re: Children's Privacy Act
by "E. ALLEN SMITH"@ocelot.
> I have examined it; I see no reason to change my stated opposition
> to it. Quite simply, it is an invasion of the privacy rights of businesses to
> force them to turn over such information as the law demands they turn
over; it
>
> is an invasion of the property rights of businesses to mandate what they do
> with the information they have received and consequently own.
>From a strict libertarian standpoint, it may implicate property rights.
I won't argue that.
But I tend to think of my (and individual) privacy rights as ones that
should receive greater attention than a businesses "privacy rights." If
they have mailing list info on me, I'd like to know where they got it.
-Declan
Return to May 1996
Return to ““E. ALLEN SMITH” <EALLENSMITH@ocelot.Rutgers.EDU>”