1996-06-24 - Re: Auto-mail filters and penet-remiler loophole?

Header Data

From: jonathon <grafolog@netcom.com>
To: Deranged Mutant <WlkngOwl@unix.asb.com>
Message Hash: 07630370eb07d8080d424253febcb846624716a4224303b3cbff8fc2eb32f83e
Message ID: <Pine.SUN.3.94.960624012258.6339C-100000@netcom3>
Reply To: <199606232055.QAA02670@unix.asb.com>
UTC Datetime: 1996-06-24 05:51:24 UTC
Raw Date: Mon, 24 Jun 1996 13:51:24 +0800

Raw message

From: jonathon <grafolog@netcom.com>
Date: Mon, 24 Jun 1996 13:51:24 +0800
To: Deranged Mutant <WlkngOwl@unix.asb.com>
Subject: Re: Auto-mail filters and penet-remiler loophole?
In-Reply-To: <199606232055.QAA02670@unix.asb.com>
Message-ID: <Pine.SUN.3.94.960624012258.6339C-100000@netcom3>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


On Sun, 23 Jun 1996, Deranged Mutant wrote:

> Date: Sun, 23 Jun 1996 16:49:07 +0000

> Seems someone sent a message to my frienly-mailer filter using penet 

	If you are using procmail, then what you want is a recipes
	at the begining like this:


	LOG=penet$NL
	:1hW:
 	^From.*.penet.fi
	.mailbox/penet

	Respond to the penet.fi messages as you wish.
	Alternatively, you can just send the message to /dev/null

	That recipe hasn't been tested, so it may need some tweeking
	on it.

        xan

        jonathon
        grafolog@netcom.com



	NETCOM --- when only the worst in internet service will suffice.







Thread