1996-06-24 - Auto-mail filters and penet-remiler loophole?

Header Data

From: “Deranged Mutant” <WlkngOwl@unix.asb.com>
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: 557006236b1b60fdad12f2d8f2957b5eaa76cc37501f7c4336e1af867aa607df
Message ID: <199606232055.QAA02670@unix.asb.com>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1996-06-24 00:58:04 UTC
Raw Date: Mon, 24 Jun 1996 08:58:04 +0800

Raw message

From: "Deranged Mutant" <WlkngOwl@unix.asb.com>
Date: Mon, 24 Jun 1996 08:58:04 +0800
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Auto-mail filters and penet-remiler loophole?
Message-ID: <199606232055.QAA02670@unix.asb.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


Hm.

Seems someone sent a message to my frienly-mailer filter using penet 
remailer.  So of course that person will get an anonymized reply, 
thus being able to know what my anon-id there is.

Fortunetly I don't use penet or rely on it for any form of security.

That's one situation where it would be nice to specify in a line 
somewhere *not* to anonymize mail sent through there (a command in 
header saying X-Do-Not-Anonymize maybe?)

Rob.

Thread

• Return to June 1996

• Return to ““Deranged Mutant” <WlkngOwl@unix.asb.com>”
• Return to “Don <don@wero.cs.byu.edu>”
• Return to “jonathon <grafolog@netcom.com>”

• Return to ““Mark M.” <markm@voicenet.com>”

• 1996-06-24 (Mon, 24 Jun 1996 08:58:04 +0800) - Auto-mail filters and penet-remiler loophole? - “Deranged Mutant” <WlkngOwl@unix.asb.com>
  • 1996-06-24 (Mon, 24 Jun 1996 13:08:02 +0800) - Re: Auto-mail filters and penet-remiler loophole? - “Mark M.” <markm@voicenet.com>
    • 1996-06-25 (Tue, 25 Jun 1996 10:29:12 +0800) - uh… HELLO?? Was Re: Auto-mail filters and penet-remiler loophole? - Don <don@wero.cs.byu.edu>
  • 1996-06-24 (Mon, 24 Jun 1996 13:51:24 +0800) - Re: Auto-mail filters and penet-remiler loophole? - jonathon <grafolog@netcom.com>