From: jonathon <grafolog@netcom.com>
To: hallam@Etna.ai.mit.edu
Message Hash: 117aacce938d1d59081ce84820fedaefa07349d6bc94765856a5f4b741625700
Message ID: <Pine.3.89.9606061558.A14010-0100000@netcom9>
Reply To: <9606052133.AA03412@Etna.ai.mit.edu>
UTC Datetime: 1996-06-07 04:05:45 UTC
Raw Date: Fri, 7 Jun 1996 12:05:45 +0800
From: jonathon <grafolog@netcom.com>
Date: Fri, 7 Jun 1996 12:05:45 +0800
To: hallam@Etna.ai.mit.edu
Subject: Re: whitehouse web incident, viva la web revolution
In-Reply-To: <9606052133.AA03412@Etna.ai.mit.edu>
Message-ID: <Pine.3.89.9606061558.A14010-0100000@netcom9>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Phill:
On Wed, 5 Jun 1996 hallam@Etna.ai.mit.edu wrote:
> You still don't understand, the $1000 is not the stake, it is merely the
> deposit. The stake is Hillary's entire net worth, that is what she is betting
Call it what you will, the odds of 25 consecutive contracts
all showing a profit are miniscle, except under one set of
circumstances. << It is something like 1 chance in
15 511 210 000 000 000 000 000 000. >>
You expect us to seriously believe that somebody with
virtually no knowledge of futures trading would not end up
having to meet at least one margin call, in 25 trades?
> trade that one would expect to make in an underwritting capacity
> for a commodity market.
> Steady profits on contracts which generally pay off.
Futures trading on contracts generally show a profit?
I guess you are talking about the person who sets up
the trades, and takes a commission on the trades,
regardless of who makes, or ( usually ) loses money.
> So you think that the Republican's in Washington haven't figured out
> what Perry Metzger has?
Statistical proof is only accepted in academia. Depending
upon your POV, this may or may not be a good thing, when
one is facing civil, or criminal charges.
Finding proof for either civil or criminal charges is a
slightly different matter.
> the US does. I have friends in both parties who have left the Washington
> political scene because they don't think the game is worth the candle.
The US Media is slightly less freindly towards politicians,
than other countries.
US Politicians are freindlier to each other,
than politicians in other countries are.
xan
jonathon
grafolog@netcom.com
**********************************************************************
* *
* Opinions expressed don't necessarily reflect my own views. *
* *
* There is no way that they can be construed to represent *
* any organization's views. *
* *
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
* *
* http://members.tripod.com/~graphology/index.html *
* *
***********************************************************************
Return to June 1996
Return to “sclawson@bottles.cs.utah.edu (steve clawson)”