1996-06-06 - Re: USA on Feds Cyberteam

Header Data

From: Alan Horowitz <alanh@infi.net>
To: John Young <jya@pipeline.com>
Message Hash: 3c1d1885a7a758fd1117e83ba402dedf7f4871c9fc2b44bfe308af2532f30e5d
Message ID: <Pine.SV4.3.91.960605221206.22400H-100000@larry.infi.net>
Reply To: <199606051318.NAA03600@pipe2.t2.usa.pipeline.com>
UTC Datetime: 1996-06-06 09:11:46 UTC
Raw Date: Thu, 6 Jun 1996 17:11:46 +0800

Raw message

From: Alan Horowitz <alanh@infi.net>
Date: Thu, 6 Jun 1996 17:11:46 +0800
To: John Young <jya@pipeline.com>
Subject: Re: USA on Feds Cyberteam
In-Reply-To: <199606051318.NAA03600@pipe2.t2.usa.pipeline.com>
Message-ID: <Pine.SV4.3.91.960605221206.22400H-100000@larry.infi.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


Guess this puts that Carnagie Mellon-based outfit ("Computer Emergency 
Response Team"?) off the govt contract teat.

Or maybe they will continue to doa all the trenchwork under contract, but 
people high up enough in the DC feeding chain to have their own PR 
appendage, will take the credit?

Thread

• Return to June 1996

• Return to “Adam Shostack <adam@homeport.org>”
• Return to “Alan Horowitz <alanh@infi.net>”

• Return to “jya@pipeline.com (John Young)”

• 1996-06-05 (Thu, 6 Jun 1996 04:37:54 +0800) - USA on Feds Cyberteam - jya@pipeline.com (John Young)
  • 1996-06-06 (Thu, 6 Jun 1996 17:11:46 +0800) - Re: USA on Feds Cyberteam - Alan Horowitz <alanh@infi.net>
    • 1996-06-07 (Fri, 7 Jun 1996 11:14:33 +0800) - Re: USA on Feds Cyberteam - Adam Shostack <adam@homeport.org>