1996-06-26 - Re: domain name zapping threat by Internic

Header Data

From: nelson@crynwr.com
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: 4bb18674208c4fc978e0e3d6b49fd22c8363947e07818ecc6d075c9fe8c0e839
Message ID: <19960626111642.6239.qmail@ns.crynwr.com>
Reply To: <199606251954.MAA13366@toad.com>
UTC Datetime: 1996-06-26 17:08:56 UTC
Raw Date: Thu, 27 Jun 1996 01:08:56 +0800

Raw message

From: nelson@crynwr.com
Date: Thu, 27 Jun 1996 01:08:56 +0800
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Re: domain name zapping threat by Internic
In-Reply-To: <199606251954.MAA13366@toad.com>
Message-ID: <19960626111642.6239.qmail@ns.crynwr.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----

Roy M. Silvernail writes:

 > Actually,  I just went through this.  I wanted scytale.net, but my ISP
 > rep was very upfront about my chances.  The .net is now reserved by
 > InterNIC for ISP's.  The .org domain is held for provable nonprofit
 > corps.  The .us domain was a possibility, but pragmatically impossible
 > due to the >4 month update latency in Minnesota.  Literally, the only
 > choice I had for a domain name was in the .com area.

In my experience, this is 100% bullshit.


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: 2.7
Comment: Processed by Mailcrypt 3.2, an Emacs/PGP interface

iQCVAwUBMdEcAabBSWSDlCdBAQFnlwQAis6ktpRIJWktljS3QZlsP3pojr6yHNCg
muwJWMczj0IR7qA97DPO6dqoO302rVJCKg6D+4yXU6rkUi3YIKYLVK/evGO4d+YH
HJd6UclikrExAIKns37xqtJhyMcMFhbOhWwsdRm1lH9iujXElWCYANXgGZiKM27S
oKU0tseg4VI=
=D6qk
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----





Thread