1996-06-15 - Re: Remailer Operator Liability?
Header Data
From: “Declan B. McCullagh” <declan+@CMU.EDU>
To: hendersn@zeta.org.au (Zed)
Message Hash: 4f635a4313752b2a230971c19a5f5d35bafdc7a7b08a173b64312ce080a24384
Message ID: <UlkgMQq00YUwQ3hq13@andrew.cmu.edu>
Reply To: <199606150753.RAA03617@godzilla.zeta.org.au>
UTC Datetime: 1996-06-15 18:33:24 UTC
Raw Date: Sun, 16 Jun 1996 02:33:24 +0800
Raw message
From: "Declan B. McCullagh" <declan+@CMU.EDU>
Date: Sun, 16 Jun 1996 02:33:24 +0800
To: hendersn@zeta.org.au (Zed)
Subject: Re: Remailer Operator Liability?
In-Reply-To: <199606150753.RAA03617@godzilla.zeta.org.au>
Message-ID: <UlkgMQq00YUwQ3hq13@andrew.cmu.edu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Excerpts from internet.cypherpunks: 15-Jun-96 Re: Remailer Operator
Liabi.. by Zed@zeta.org.au
> distributed to a minor who was using a nym. I think pressure on anonymous
> remailers is going to increase as various groups complain that the paw
> innocent widdle kiddies are "vulnerable to corruption"(or some bullshit like
> that) because their age can be hidden. Read the decision. The CDA _may_ be
This is true. Yesterday evening I interviewed the director of
enforcement for a TLA here in DC. He expressed his concern about
anonymous remailers and anonymity online. (More on this later.)
The word here in DC is "accountability."
-Declan
Thread
Return to June 1996
- Return to ““Declan B. McCullagh” <declan+@CMU.EDU>”
- Return to “hendersn@zeta.org.au (Zed)”
- Return to “Krister Walfridsson <cato@df.lth.se>”
Return to ““Perry E. Metzger” <perry@piermont.com>”
- 1996-06-15 (Sat, 15 Jun 1996 19:34:35 +0800) - Re: Remailer Operator Liability? - hendersn@zeta.org.au (Zed)
- 1996-06-15 (Sun, 16 Jun 1996 02:33:24 +0800) - Re: Remailer Operator Liability? - “Declan B. McCullagh” <declan+@CMU.EDU>
- 1996-06-16 (Sun, 16 Jun 1996 11:03:35 +0800) - Cryptology and knot theory? - Krister Walfridsson <cato@df.lth.se>
- 1996-06-16 (Sun, 16 Jun 1996 12:00:27 +0800) - Re: Cryptology and knot theory? - “Perry E. Metzger” <perry@piermont.com>
- 1996-06-16 (Sun, 16 Jun 1996 17:32:34 +0800) - Re: Cryptology and knot theory? - Krister Walfridsson <cato@df.lth.se>
- 1996-06-16 (Sun, 16 Jun 1996 12:00:27 +0800) - Re: Cryptology and knot theory? - “Perry E. Metzger” <perry@piermont.com>
- 1996-06-16 (Sun, 16 Jun 1996 11:03:35 +0800) - Cryptology and knot theory? - Krister Walfridsson <cato@df.lth.se>
- 1996-06-15 (Sun, 16 Jun 1996 02:33:24 +0800) - Re: Remailer Operator Liability? - “Declan B. McCullagh” <declan+@CMU.EDU>