From: nelson@crynwr.com
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: a4e281abb700d8896a94e1bef0fefc07689adaf81379484ca9e22ee05ec2e541
Message ID: <19960608040239.16261.qmail@ns.crynwr.com>
Reply To: <FBBE9A4A02502C79@-SMF->
UTC Datetime: 1996-06-08 07:33:09 UTC
Raw Date: Sat, 8 Jun 1996 15:33:09 +0800
From: nelson@crynwr.com
Date: Sat, 8 Jun 1996 15:33:09 +0800
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: mailing-list through a remailer
In-Reply-To: <FBBE9A4A02502C79@-SMF->
Message-ID: <19960608040239.16261.qmail@ns.crynwr.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Scott Binkley writes:
> Having a mailing-list run through a remailer??
Only through a penet-type remailer. It couldn't work at all with a
mixmaster-type, and would work but poorly with a ghio-type with reply
block.
> It would be double blind, and difficult to find out who ran the list.
Only if your name isn't Julf.
> If you chained the remailers, it would be even more difficult.
If you chained the remailers for your subscription, then every message
would travel the same path.
-russ <nelson@crynwr.com> http://www.crynwr.com/~nelson
Crynwr Software | Crynwr Software sells packet driver support | PGP ok
11 Grant St. | +1 315 268 1925 voice | It's no mistake to err on
Potsdam, NY 13676 | +1 315 268 9201 FAX | the side of freedom.
Return to June 1996
Return to “nelson@crynwr.com”
Unknown thread root