1996-07-26 - Re: Freeh Testimony 7/25/96

Header Data

From: David Sternlight <david@sternlight.com>
To: “Declan B. McCullagh” <cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: 0bdeb9cb1b61d2d0e5b3d3f01c91dfc939f052f6221a7817ddd34547e59b767b
Message ID: <v03007806ae1edadfc391@[192.187.162.15]>
Reply To: <v03007804ae1e2226c5ed@[192.187.162.15]>
UTC Datetime: 1996-07-26 23:52:20 UTC
Raw Date: Sat, 27 Jul 1996 07:52:20 +0800

Raw message

From: David Sternlight <david@sternlight.com>
Date: Sat, 27 Jul 1996 07:52:20 +0800
To: "Declan B. McCullagh" <cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Re: Freeh Testimony 7/25/96
In-Reply-To: <v03007804ae1e2226c5ed@[192.187.162.15]>
Message-ID: <v03007806ae1edadfc391@[192.187.162.15]>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


At 8:55 AM -0700 7/26/96, Declan B. McCullagh wrote:
>David's comments bring more heat than light.
>
>Freeh's statements were not distributed to senators before the hearing,
>so they couldn't have read his prepared statement.
>
>Further, he wandered considerably from his prepared statement at the
>hearing. I wonder why David is talking about what Freeh addressed in his
>statement, instead of what he actually said.

Because that's what Banisar pointed us to in his message. Had he qualified
his own post of Freeh's opening statement I might have reacted differently.

This increases the odds on "sloppy" rather than "mendacious".

David







Thread