From: "Declan B. McCullagh" <declan+@CMU.EDU>
Date: Sat, 27 Jul 1996 02:37:06 +0800
To: david@sternlight.com>
Subject: Re: Freeh Testimony 7/25/96
In-Reply-To: <v03007804ae1e2226c5ed@[192.187.162.15]>
Message-ID: <olyCdry00YUw0E77M0@andrew.cmu.edu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


David's comments bring more heat than light.

Freeh's statements were not distributed to senators before the hearing,
so they couldn't have read his prepared statement.

Further, he wandered considerably from his prepared statement at the
hearing. I wonder why David is talking about what Freeh addressed in his
statement, instead of what he actually said.

-Declan
 


Excerpts from internet.cypherpunks: 26-Jul-96 Re: Freeh Testimony
7/25/96 by David Sternlight@sternli 
> They cannot have read his prepared statement, which addresses this issue
> (see below). Neither, apparently did you, Dave, or you would not leave the
> misleading impression Freeh didn't address this topic. Were you being
> sloppy? Mendacious?