1996-07-21 - Re: Firewall Penetration

Header Data

From: peng-chiew low <pclow@pc.jaring.my>
To: Frank Willoughby <frankw@in.net>
Message Hash: 6cd834e3d21be4aa4d237999df30753c16a1a037991cbdd14f41b4c864b14c44
Message ID: <31F25025.3509@pc.jaring.my>
Reply To: <9607211223.AA29688@su1.in.net>
UTC Datetime: 1996-07-21 16:40:41 UTC
Raw Date: Mon, 22 Jul 1996 00:40:41 +0800

Raw message

From: peng-chiew low <pclow@pc.jaring.my>
Date: Mon, 22 Jul 1996 00:40:41 +0800
To: Frank Willoughby <frankw@in.net>
Subject: Re: Firewall Penetration
In-Reply-To: <9607211223.AA29688@su1.in.net>
Message-ID: <31F25025.3509@pc.jaring.my>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


Frank Willoughby wrote:

> FWIW, of @70 firwalls on the market, only @5 are adequate to protect
> a company from the hazards of the Internet.

And of course, we would have to pay to find that out, right? :)

Thread

• Return to July 1996

• Return to “David Sternlight <david@sternlight.com>”
• Return to “Frank Willoughby <frankw@in.net>”

• Return to “peng-chiew low <pclow@pc.jaring.my>”

• 1996-07-21 (Sun, 21 Jul 1996 23:28:16 +0800) - Re: Firewall Penetration - Frank Willoughby <frankw@in.net>
  • 1996-07-21 (Mon, 22 Jul 1996 00:40:41 +0800) - Re: Firewall Penetration - peng-chiew low <pclow@pc.jaring.my>
  • 1996-07-21 (Mon, 22 Jul 1996 02:56:31 +0800) - Re: Firewall Penetration - David Sternlight <david@sternlight.com>