1996-07-21 - Re: Firewall Penetration

Header Data

From: David Sternlight <david@sternlight.com>
To: Frank Willoughby <cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: fc7979633bd43d8967dfeecf60a2bd0f575067874031e79eeeee2254c7f0a1a3
Message ID: <v0300760dae180d9ec5e3@[192.187.162.15]>
Reply To: <9607211223.AA29688@su1.in.net>
UTC Datetime: 1996-07-21 18:56:31 UTC
Raw Date: Mon, 22 Jul 1996 02:56:31 +0800

Raw message

From: David Sternlight <david@sternlight.com>
Date: Mon, 22 Jul 1996 02:56:31 +0800
To: Frank Willoughby <cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Re: Firewall Penetration
In-Reply-To: <9607211223.AA29688@su1.in.net>
Message-ID: <v0300760dae180d9ec5e3@[192.187.162.15]>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


At 5:23 AM -0700 7/21/96, Frank Willoughby wrote:
>At 08:18 PM 7/20/96 -0700, Jerome Tan allegedly wrote:
>
>> Is it possible to penetrate a firewall?
>
>Absolutely.  (Having done so a time or two)
>
>FWIW, of @70 firwalls on the market, only @5 are adequate to protect
>a company from the hazards of the Internet.
>

o.k., I'll bite. Which 5?

David

Thread

• Return to July 1996

• Return to “David Sternlight <david@sternlight.com>”
• Return to “Frank Willoughby <frankw@in.net>”

• Return to “peng-chiew low <pclow@pc.jaring.my>”

• 1996-07-21 (Sun, 21 Jul 1996 23:28:16 +0800) - Re: Firewall Penetration - Frank Willoughby <frankw@in.net>
  • 1996-07-21 (Mon, 22 Jul 1996 00:40:41 +0800) - Re: Firewall Penetration - peng-chiew low <pclow@pc.jaring.my>
  • 1996-07-21 (Mon, 22 Jul 1996 02:56:31 +0800) - Re: Firewall Penetration - David Sternlight <david@sternlight.com>