1996-07-10 - Re: Contracts, Responsibilities, and Drug-Dispensing

Header Data

From: Wei Dai <weidai@eskimo.com>
To: Bill Frantz <frantz@netcom.com>
Message Hash: 758baf6ed835f9ff7c19208aabc4288546a0df387b3c622c31d6fc9307c9ce49
Message ID: <Pine.SUN.3.94.960709165857.3540B-100000@eskimo.com>
Reply To: <199607092212.PAA15529@netcom7.netcom.com>
UTC Datetime: 1996-07-10 06:09:46 UTC
Raw Date: Wed, 10 Jul 1996 14:09:46 +0800

Raw message

From: Wei Dai <weidai@eskimo.com>
Date: Wed, 10 Jul 1996 14:09:46 +0800
To: Bill Frantz <frantz@netcom.com>
Subject: Re: Contracts, Responsibilities, and Drug-Dispensing
In-Reply-To: <199607092212.PAA15529@netcom7.netcom.com>
Message-ID: <Pine.SUN.3.94.960709165857.3540B-100000@eskimo.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


On Tue, 9 Jul 1996, Bill Frantz wrote:

> ObCrypto: When may a minor child say no to PAK (Parental Access to Keys)?

Interesting threat model... What can one do in the total absense of
physical security?  We've talked about mental cryptography before, but I
think we agreed that it isn't very practical.  Perhaps security through
obscurity is a better solution here, since many parents are less computer
literate than their children.

Perhaps in the future kids will get non-removable tamperproof
microchip implants behind their parents' backs. :)

Wei Dai







Thread