From: frantz@netcom.com (Bill Frantz)
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: f6fb13af73b4e6a3dbd425c5d799a4fd8ca81eadad5d9d47ee4df069f89736dd
Message ID: <199607092212.PAA15529@netcom7.netcom.com>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1996-07-10 04:07:06 UTC
Raw Date: Wed, 10 Jul 1996 12:07:06 +0800
From: frantz@netcom.com (Bill Frantz)
Date: Wed, 10 Jul 1996 12:07:06 +0800
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Re: Contracts, Responsibilities, and Drug-Dispensing
Message-ID: <199607092212.PAA15529@netcom7.netcom.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
I think the really interesting question underlying this whole discussion is
how a minor child makes the legal transition to a competent adult. This
issue comes up again and again. We see it in "parental consent" laws
requiring parental consent for a minor girl to get an abortion. We also
see it in issues like when a minor child may throw off the "protection" of
products like SurfWatch.
ObCrypto: When may a minor child say no to PAK (Parental Access to Keys)?
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Bill Frantz | The Internet may fairly be | Periwinkle -- Consulting
(408)356-8506 | regarded as a never-ending | 16345 Englewood Ave.
frantz@netcom.com | worldwide conversation. | Los Gatos, CA 95032, USA
Return to July 1996
Return to “Wei Dai <weidai@eskimo.com>”