1996-07-09 - Re: What remains to be done.

Header Data

From: Elliot Lee <sopwith@redhat.com>
To: Ray Arachelian <sunder@dorsai.dorsai.org>
Message Hash: a151648b40181044507fd4e1d9879f863de2752450e98d181a8a48d736175e1d
Message ID: <Pine.LNX.3.93.960708205907.28245G-100000@redhat.com>
Reply To: <Pine.SUN.3.91.960708140840.22851F-100000@dorsai>
UTC Datetime: 1996-07-09 05:02:35 UTC
Raw Date: Tue, 9 Jul 1996 13:02:35 +0800

Raw message

From: Elliot Lee <sopwith@redhat.com>
Date: Tue, 9 Jul 1996 13:02:35 +0800
To: Ray Arachelian <sunder@dorsai.dorsai.org>
Subject: Re: What remains to be done.
In-Reply-To: <Pine.SUN.3.91.960708140840.22851F-100000@dorsai>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.3.93.960708205907.28245G-100000@redhat.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


On Mon, 8 Jul 1996, Ray Arachelian wrote:

> I'm constantly switching between NT and 95 and have them installed on the 
> same drive.  Would be cool to have some low level driver to encryption 
> from the Master Boot Record for example to get around unfriendly OS's- but 
> then NT won't respect the BIOS calls, 95 in 32 bit mode won't, Linux sure 
> as hell wont, etc....

Linux, however, does have the cfs (crypted filesystem), which will let you
do the same thing. Supposedly lets you plug in your own encryption method
and all that... Also allows different users to encrypt with different
passwords, and such (or just the root user encrypt the whole partition).
Find the web page for more info.

\\\| Elliot Lee                |\\\    ||  "Claim to fame":
 \\\| Red Hat Software          |\\\   ||  Live in only town in the
  \\\| Webmaster www.redhat.com, |\\\  ||  USA with an unlisted ZIP
   \\\| Programmer, etc.          |\\\ ||  code.






Thread