1996-08-18 - Re: Orbiting Datahavens

Header Data

From: snow <snow@smoke.suba.com>
To: “Brian C. Lane” <blane@aa.net>
Message Hash: 09e9cb745cdf52754b281e29dee3e6aabc2eaeb4e5dadd53191f6b490389310b
Message ID: <Pine.LNX.3.93.960817183047.2135A-100000@smoke.suba.com>
Reply To: <32155657.53661@mail.aa.net>
UTC Datetime: 1996-08-18 02:09:38 UTC
Raw Date: Sun, 18 Aug 1996 10:09:38 +0800

Raw message

From: snow <snow@smoke.suba.com>
Date: Sun, 18 Aug 1996 10:09:38 +0800
To: "Brian C. Lane" <blane@aa.net>
Subject: Re: Orbiting Datahavens
In-Reply-To: <32155657.53661@mail.aa.net>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.3.93.960817183047.2135A-100000@smoke.suba.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


On Sat, 17 Aug 1996, Brian C. Lane wrote:
>   With all the recent talk about converted oil-rig DataHavens floating
> around the oceans, fending off pirates, and Low-Orbit satellite
> communications, I had a thought.
>   How about an orbiting DataHaven. No jurisdiction to bother with,
> extremely difficult to get to (except by large governments...). You could
> put together a couple of Linux boxes with a RAID system, some backups and a
> large solar panel and have a very nice, secure DataHaven.
>   Granted, you wouldn't have all the fun of floating around the south
> pacific fending off pirates and navies who are after your data, but it
> would work. Might even be cheaper than outfitting the oil-ring with the
> rate that they are tossing satellites into space.
>   If the HAM radio community can get a satellite into space, why not the
> Cypherpunks/Linux communities?

     It is just as easy to take out a satelite in LOE as it is to sink an
oil rig, plus swapping defective Hard Drives is a real bitch.

Petro, Christopher C.
petro@suba.com <prefered for any non-list stuff>
snow@smoke.suba.com






Thread