From: Rabid Wombat <wombat@mcfeely.bsfs.org>
To: John Young <jya@pipeline.com>
Message Hash: 4707ee31e71b5de9582ae9981fb03b93dccfabb567c8339afa68e6521c37934a
Message ID: <Pine.BSF.3.91.960812015431.25054A-100000@mcfeely.bsfs.org>
Reply To: <199608112108.VAA23815@pipe1.ny3.usa.pipeline.com>
UTC Datetime: 1996-08-12 06:01:39 UTC
Raw Date: Mon, 12 Aug 1996 14:01:39 +0800
From: Rabid Wombat <wombat@mcfeely.bsfs.org>
Date: Mon, 12 Aug 1996 14:01:39 +0800
To: John Young <jya@pipeline.com>
Subject: (Off Topic) Re: FCC_ups
In-Reply-To: <199608112108.VAA23815@pipe1.ny3.usa.pipeline.com>
Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.3.91.960812015431.25054A-100000@mcfeely.bsfs.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
(no crypto here, so delete it already) :)
Yeah, right.
The tier one ISPs are refusing to peer with anyone that does not have at
least a T3 backbone cross-country, as they don't want to have to carry
other's bits long haul at no charge.. This is to keep "small ISP" from
opening locations all over the country, and connecting to "the Internet"
(bigger providors with cross-country capacity) without paying for the
long-haul capacity.
Just because this scheme is economical on a small scale (probably only
looking at the costs of the two "ends", and considering the long haul to
be "free") doesn't mean that it will work on a large scale. Large ISPs
pay the same costs for infrastructure as telephone companies - or more.
POTS takes 64 Kb/s for one call, or 24 calls per T1. Analog from the CO to
your house, digital in between COs. Packetizing the voice transmission to
carry it in IP increases the required bandwidth, unless compression is
used. Compression is getting better, but even state-of-the-art systems at
16 Kb/s sound like a bad connection on a car phone, IMHO. Go lower, and
you sound like Mickey Mouse - or Mickey on a car phone. ;) I'd rather
pay the dime lady $.10 per minute for a good connection than pay somebody
else $.05-.08 for compressed audio.
On top of all that, most sound cards in PCs (today) are only capable of
half-duplex audio. If you don't know why that matters, go play with your
walkie-talkie a bit.
"The Internet" isn't "free", and as more delay-sensitive applications
(voice, video) are added, ISPs will only become MORE aware of the demands
their client's activities place on their capacity. I'd rather not see
usage tarrifed on a volume basis, but this sort of approach to doing
business on the 'net only makes such charges more likely.
Twenty years from now, you'll still have a few players dominating the top
level - the infrastructure needed to support communications is expensive
to create, maintain, and manage. The economies of scale in this industry
will drive others out of the top tier. There will still be plenty of
niche providors that focus on the vertical markets, and lease their
bandwidth from the big players - same as today. As for whether the
players will be the same as today, that depends. If the railroads had
realized that they were in the transportation business, instead of the
train business, they'd be flying airplanes today.
Anyone that wants to carry a large volume of traffic via the 'net will
find that either the market will dictate that they pay for the bandwidth
they use, or the FCC will. I don't see the FCC getting involved, unless
the "phone service via internet" providor tries to use the courts to get
out of paying for the bandwidth they use. They'll be restricted by the
size of the "pipe" they purchase from their ISP, and the ISPs all charge
more for access from larger "pipes." If they lease their own
cross-country circuits, they'll pay the same (or higher) costs as the Telcos.
The large telephone companies are moving away from circuit switched
networks, and towards packet switched networks - have been for years.
It's called ATM, and it's not in wide use yet. There are advantages to
building large scale communication systems this way, but "free bandwidth"
is not one of them.
- Ranting Wombat
On Sun, 11 Aug 1996, John Young wrote:
> 8-10-96. WaPo:
>
> "Phone Service Via the Internet May Slash Rates."
>
> Labs of Advanced Technology has developed a way for
> people to make long-distance calls over the Internet
> using only their telephones, at about half the price of
SNIP
> phone companies. "Twenty years from now, and probably
> sooner, I don't see the giants of the telecommunications
> industry existing anymore," said the company's
> president. The giants hoot, "FCC, PACs, whack him."
SNIP
Return to August 1996
Return to “Vipul Ved Prakash <vipul@pobox.com>”