Vipul Ved Prakash <vipul@pobox.com> (56 posts)

Be aware that many list participants used multiple email addresses over their time active on the list. As such this page may not contain all threads available.

Threads

Re: Crypto CD

• 1996-03-24 (Mon, 25 Mar 1996 04:50:18 +0800) - Re: Crypto CD - “Vipul Ved Prakash” <vipul@pobox.com>

Psuedo-Ramdom Number Generator

• 1996-03-31 (Sun, 31 Mar 1996 09:20:19 +0800) - Psuedo-Ramdom Number Generator - “Vipul Ved Prakash” <vipul@pobox.com>

Securing CDROM from piracy

• 1996-05-16 (Thu, 16 May 1996 14:31:53 +0800) - Securing CDROM from piracy - Vipul Ved Prakash <vipul@pobox.com>
  • 1996-05-17 (Sat, 18 May 1996 04:05:08 +0800) - Re: Securing CDROM from piracy - “Perry E. Metzger” <perry@piermont.com>
    • 1996-05-17 (Sat, 18 May 1996 07:57:04 +0800) - Re: Securing CDROM from piracy - Ed Carp <erc@dal1820.computek.net>
  • 1996-05-18 (Sat, 18 May 1996 11:57:09 +0800) - Re: Securing CDROM from piracy - Rich Graves <llurch@networking.stanford.edu>

Re: Securing CDROM from piracy

• Unknown thread root
  • 1996-05-18 (Sat, 18 May 1996 11:23:19 +0800) - Re: Securing CDROM from piracy - Vipul Ved Prakash <vipul@pobox.com>

Re: Securing CDROM from piracy

• Unknown thread root
  • 1996-05-18 (Sat, 18 May 1996 13:03:59 +0800) - Re: Securing CDROM from piracy - Vipul Ved Prakash <vipul@pobox.com>
    • 1996-05-18 (Sat, 18 May 1996 09:28:00 +0800) - Re: Securing CDROM from piracy - Ray Arachelian <sunder@dorsai.dorsai.org>

pretty good reputation

• 1996-06-15 (Sun, 16 Jun 1996 06:58:24 +0800) - pretty good reputation - Vipul Ved Prakash <vipul@pobox.com>
  • 1996-06-16 (Sun, 16 Jun 1996 11:19:58 +0800) - Re: pretty good reputation - Black Unicorn <unicorn@schloss.li>

Re: pretty good reputation

• Unknown thread root
  • 1996-06-18 (Tue, 18 Jun 1996 13:04:03 +0800) - Re: pretty good reputation - Vipul Ved Prakash <vipul@pobox.com>

FCC_ups

• 1996-08-11 (Mon, 12 Aug 1996 07:08:47 +0800) - FCC_ups - jya@pipeline.com (John Young)
  • 1996-08-12 (Mon, 12 Aug 1996 11:57:25 +0800) - Re: FCC _ ups - Simon Spero <ses@tipper.oit.unc.edu>
  • 1996-08-12 (Mon, 12 Aug 1996 14:01:39 +0800) - (Off Topic) Re: FCC_ups - Rabid Wombat <wombat@mcfeely.bsfs.org>
  • 1996-08-16 (Sat, 17 Aug 1996 07:03:08 +0800) - Re: FCC_ups - Vipul Ved Prakash <vipul@pobox.com>

Floating DataHaven

• Unknown thread root
  • 1996-08-16 (Fri, 16 Aug 1996 10:45:09 +0800) - Floating DataHaven - Vincent Cate <vince@offshore.com.ai>
    • 1996-08-16 (Fri, 16 Aug 1996 13:05:46 +0800) - Re: Floating DataHaven - Vincent Cate <vince@offshore.com.ai>
    • 1996-08-16 (Fri, 16 Aug 1996 13:37:20 +0800) - Re: Floating DataHaven - Enzo Michelangeli <enzo@ima.com>
    • 1996-08-16 (Fri, 16 Aug 1996 20:47:45 +0800) - Billy boy’s satellites [Was - Floating DataHaven] - Gary Howland <gary@systemics.com>
      • 1996-08-16 (Sat, 17 Aug 1996 05:16:54 +0800) - Re: Billy boy’s satellites [Was - Floating DataHaven] - Sandy Sandfort <sandfort@crl.com>
      • 1996-08-19 (Mon, 19 Aug 1996 18:43:26 +0800) - Re: Billy boy’s satellites [Was - Floating DataHaven] - Vipul Ved Prakash <vipul@pobox.com>
    • 1996-08-16 (Sat, 17 Aug 1996 07:31:23 +0800) - Re: Floating DataHaven - Black Unicorn <unicorn@schloss.li>

Re: FCC_ups

• 1996-08-18 (Mon, 19 Aug 1996 03:39:03 +0800) - Re: FCC_ups - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>
  • 1996-08-20 (Wed, 21 Aug 1996 06:18:20 +0800) - Phoneco vs X-Phone - Vipul Ved Prakash <vipul@pobox.com>

Spamming (Good or Bad?)

• 1996-08-21 (Wed, 21 Aug 1996 09:00:53 +0800) - Spamming (Good or Bad?) - Vipul Ved Prakash <vipul@pobox.com>
  • 1996-08-21 (Wed, 21 Aug 1996 12:20:31 +0800) - Re: Spamming (Good or Bad?) - Jim Gillogly <jim@acm.org>
  • 1996-08-21 (Wed, 21 Aug 1996 13:05:31 +0800) - Re: Spamming (Good or Bad?) - Rich Graves <rich@c2.org>

Re: Hackers invade DOJ web site

• 1996-08-18 (Sun, 18 Aug 1996 19:57:18 +0800) - Re: Hackers invade DOJ web site - Frank Stuart <fstuart@vetmed.auburn.edu>
  • 1996-08-20 (Wed, 21 Aug 1996 04:01:51 +0800) - Re: Hackers invade DOJ web site - Will Day <willday@rom.oit.gatech.edu>
    • 1996-08-21 (Wed, 21 Aug 1996 09:21:55 +0800) - Re: Hackers invade DOJ web site - Vipul Ved Prakash <vipul@pobox.com>

Re: Phoneco vs X-Phone

• 1996-08-20 (Tue, 20 Aug 1996 09:44:44 +0800) - Re: Phoneco vs X-Phone - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>
  • 1996-08-21 (Wed, 21 Aug 1996 14:48:27 +0800) - Re: Phoneco vs X-Phone - Vipul Ved Prakash <vipul@pobox.com>

DOJ Scam!

• 1996-08-22 (Fri, 23 Aug 1996 05:45:50 +0800) - DOJ Scam! - Vipul Ved Prakash <vipul@pobox.com>

Re: Spamming

• 1996-08-21 (Thu, 22 Aug 1996 05:35:24 +0800) - Re: Spamming - “James C. Sewell” <jims@MPGN.COM>
  • 1996-08-22 (Thu, 22 Aug 1996 09:48:06 +0800) - Re: Spamming - chris230@juno.com (Chris J Samuelson)
  • 1996-08-22 (Fri, 23 Aug 1996 05:46:13 +0800) - Re: Spamming - Vipul Ved Prakash <vipul@pobox.com>

Re: Spamming (Good or Bad?)

• 1996-08-21 (Wed, 21 Aug 1996 16:56:33 +0800) - Re: Spamming (Good or Bad?) - tcmay@got.net (Timothy C. May)
  • 1996-08-21 (Thu, 22 Aug 1996 02:34:48 +0800) - Re: Spamming (Good or Bad?) - Asgaard <asgaard@Cor.sos.sll.se>
    • 1996-08-21 (Thu, 22 Aug 1996 05:26:23 +0800) - Re: Spamming (Good or Bad?) - Jim Gillogly <jim@ACM.ORG>
    • 1996-08-22 (Thu, 22 Aug 1996 08:09:39 +0800) - Re: Spamming (Good or Bad?) - Gary Howland <gary@systemics.com>
    • 1996-08-22 (Fri, 23 Aug 1996 05:52:32 +0800) - Re: Spamming (Good or Bad?) - Vipul Ved Prakash <vipul@pobox.com>
    • 1996-08-23 (Fri, 23 Aug 1996 19:39:45 +0800) - Re: Spamming (Good or Bad?) - Vipul Ved Prakash <vipul@pobox.com>
      • 1996-08-24 (Sun, 25 Aug 1996 02:21:32 +0800) - Wtf????? - “Z.B.” <zachb@netcom.com>
  • 1996-08-22 (Thu, 22 Aug 1996 08:28:47 +0800) - Re: Spamming (Good or Bad?) - “Paul S. Penrod” <furballs@netcom.com>
    • 1996-08-22 (Thu, 22 Aug 1996 08:24:15 +0800) - Re: Spamming (Good or Bad?) - Jim Gillogly <jim@ACM.ORG>
      • 1996-08-23 (Fri, 23 Aug 1996 11:38:28 +0800) - Re: Spamming (Good or Bad?) - “Paul S. Penrod” <furballs@netcom.com>

Re: Spamming (Good or Bad?)

• 1996-08-21 (Wed, 21 Aug 1996 13:46:44 +0800) - Re: Spamming (Good or Bad?) - “Ross Wright” <rwright@adnetsol.com>
  • 1996-08-21 (Wed, 21 Aug 1996 16:14:51 +0800) - Re: Spamming (Good or Bad?) - Rich Graves <rich@c2.org>
  • 1996-08-21 (Thu, 22 Aug 1996 06:40:51 +0800) - Re: Spamming (Good or Bad?) - Brian Davis <bdavis@thepoint.net>
    • 1996-08-23 (Fri, 23 Aug 1996 18:48:42 +0800) - Re: Spamming (Good or Bad?) - Vipul Ved Prakash <vipul@pobox.com>
      • 1996-08-23 (Fri, 23 Aug 1996 20:03:14 +0800) - Re: Spamming (Good or Bad?) - dlv@bwalk.dm.com (Dr.Dimitri Vulis KOTM)
    • 1996-08-24 (Sat, 24 Aug 1996 15:56:16 -0700 (PDT)) - Re: Spamming (Good or Bad?) - Firebeard <stend@grendel.austin.texas.net>

Re: Spamming

• 1996-08-25 (Sun, 25 Aug 1996 08:09:54 +0800) - Re: Spamming - Vipul Ved Prakash <vipul@pobox.com>

Web Resource on Netspam

• 1996-08-25 (Sun, 25 Aug 1996 08:54:27 +0800) - Web Resource on Netspam - Vipul Ved Prakash <vipul@pobox.com>
  • 1996-08-25 (Sun, 25 Aug 1996 12:21:05 +0800) - Re: Web Resource on Netspam - Joseph Seanor <cibir@netcom.com>

Re: Spamming

• 1996-08-23 (Fri, 23 Aug 1996 08:54:39 +0800) - Re: Spamming - John Deters <jad@dsddhc.com>
  • 1996-08-23 (Fri, 23 Aug 1996 11:45:13 +0800) - Re: Spamming - Rich Graves <rich@c2.org>
  • 1996-08-25 (Sun, 25 Aug 1996 09:47:49 +0800) - Re: Spamming - Vipul Ved Prakash <vipul@pobox.com>

Weird “Suppression” messages

• 1996-08-24 (Sat, 24 Aug 1996 18:52:47 +0800) - Weird “Suppression” messages - Alan Olsen <alano@teleport.com>
  • 1996-08-24 (Sun, 25 Aug 1996 02:40:08 +0800) - Re: Weird “Suppression” messages - Rich Graves <llurch@networking.stanford.edu>
  • 1996-08-24 (Sun, 25 Aug 1996 05:21:00 +0800) - Re: Weird “Suppression” messages - Brian Durham <bdurham@metronet.com>
  • 1996-08-24 (Sun, 25 Aug 1996 05:26:29 +0800) - Re: Weird “Suppression” messages - “Z.B.” <zachb@netcom.com>
    • 1996-08-25 (Sun, 25 Aug 1996 11:10:03 +0800) - Re: Weird “Suppression” messages - Vipul Ved Prakash <vipul@pobox.com>

bot at anon.penet.fi

• 1996-08-27 (Tue, 27 Aug 1996 10:05:17 +0800) - bot at anon.penet.fi - Vipul Ved Prakash <vipul@pobox.com>

Nuke attack? No, bug in DNS! (fwd)

• 1996-08-27 (Tue, 27 Aug 1996 10:24:51 +0800) - Nuke attack? No, bug in DNS! (fwd) - Vipul Ved Prakash <vipul@pobox.com>
  • 1996-08-27 (Wed, 28 Aug 1996 01:30:03 +0800) - Re: BoS: Nuke attack? No, bug in DNS! (fwd) - Mike Scher <strange@tezcat.com>

Re: Spamming (fwd)

• 1996-08-28 (Wed, 28 Aug 1996 23:36:54 +0800) - Re: Spamming (fwd) - Vipul Ved Prakash <vipul@pobox.com>

Cypherpunks Home Page

• 1996-08-29 (Thu, 29 Aug 1996 08:05:52 +0800) - Cypherpunks Home Page - Vipul Ved Prakash <vipul@pobox.com>

[NOISE] The Doors

• 1996-09-03 (Wed, 4 Sep 1996 05:44:55 +0800) - [NOISE] The Doors - Vipul Ved Prakash <vipul@pobox.com>

Re: Reputations

• 1996-09-06 (Fri, 6 Sep 1996 19:38:59 +0800) - Re: Reputations - gregburk@netcom.com (Greg Burk)
  • 1996-09-07 (Sat, 7 Sep 1996 18:35:31 +0800) - Re: Reputations - Vipul Ved Prakash <vipul@pobox.com>

“Unwanted Mail”

• 1996-09-13 (Fri, 13 Sep 1996 12:13:14 +0800) - “Unwanted Mail” - tcmay@got.net (Timothy C. May)
  • 1996-09-13 (Fri, 13 Sep 1996 16:57:50 +0800) - Re: “Unwanted Mail” - Rabid Wombat <wombat@mcfeely.bsfs.org>
  • 1996-09-13 (Sat, 14 Sep 1996 03:20:05 +0800) - Re: “Unwanted Mail” - Vipul Ved Prakash <vipul@pobox.com>

Euro-Commission to tackle porn on Internet

• 1996-09-25 (Thu, 26 Sep 1996 05:38:40 +0800) - Euro-Commission to tackle porn on Internet - Vipul Ved Prakash <vipul@pobox.com>

Proxies

• 1996-11-10 (Sun, 10 Nov 1996 11:18:15 -0800 (PST)) - Proxies - Vipul Ved Prakash <vipul@pobox.com>

Forming a multinational

• 1996-11-25 (Mon, 25 Nov 1996 10:18:41 -0800 (PST)) - Forming a multinational - Vipul Ved Prakash <vipul@pobox.com>

HP

• 1996-12-05 (Thu, 5 Dec 1996 11:02:09 -0800 (PST)) - HP - Vipul Ved Prakash <vipul@pobox.com>

NSClean

• 1996-12-18 (Wed, 18 Dec 1996 00:49:12 -0800 (PST)) - NSClean - Vipul Ved Prakash <vipul@pobox.com>
  • 1996-12-18 (Wed, 18 Dec 1996 07:10:22 -0800 (PST)) - Re: NSClean - Mike McNally <m5@tivoli.com>
    • 1996-12-18 (Wed, 18 Dec 1996 09:35:18 -0800 (PST)) - Re: NSClean - Eric Murray <ericm@lne.com>

No computer access for criminals

• 1996-12-18 (Wed, 18 Dec 1996 00:51:34 -0800 (PST)) - No computer access for criminals - Vipul Ved Prakash <vipul@pobox.com>

Iranian clergic attacks Internet as ‘poison’ to the masses (fwd)

• 1996-12-25 (Wed, 25 Dec 1996 09:24:04 -0800 (PST)) - Iranian clergic attacks Internet as ‘poison’ to the masses (fwd) - Vipul Ved Prakash <vipul@pobox.com>
  • 1996-12-25 (Wed, 25 Dec 1996 15:33:29 -0800 (PST)) - Re: Iranian clergic attacks Internet as ‘poison’ to the masses (fwd) - Carl Johnson <toto@sk.sympatico.ca>

Internet companies demonstrate portable security

• 1997-01-28 (Tue, 28 Jan 1997 15:03:18 -0800 (PST)) - Internet companies demonstrate portable security - Vipul Ved Prakash <vipul@pobox.com>

Child Porn

• 1997-01-28 (Tue, 28 Jan 1997 15:17:10 -0800 (PST)) - Child Porn - Vipul Ved Prakash <vipul@pobox.com>

Child Porn

• 1997-01-29 (Tue, 28 Jan 1997 16:26:28 -0800 (PST)) - Child Porn - Vipul Ved Prakash <vipul@pobox.com>

Internet companies demonstrate portable security

• 1997-01-29 (Tue, 28 Jan 1997 16:28:08 -0800 (PST)) - Internet companies demonstrate portable security - Vipul Ved Prakash <vipul@pobox.com>

CompuServe reports e-mail court victory

• 1997-02-13 (Thu, 13 Feb 1997 11:19:18 -0800 (PST)) - CompuServe reports e-mail court victory - Vipul Ved Prakash <vipul@pobox.com>

N.Y. judge rules for Planned Parenthood in web site case

• 1997-02-13 (Thu, 13 Feb 1997 11:19:25 -0800 (PST)) - N.Y. judge rules for Planned Parenthood in web site case - Vipul Ved Prakash <vipul@pobox.com>

CompuServe reports e-mail court victory

• 1997-02-13 (Thu, 13 Feb 1997 11:58:38 -0800 (PST)) - CompuServe reports e-mail court victory - Vipul Ved Prakash <vipul@pobox.com>

N.Y. judge rules for Planned Parenthood in web site case

• 1997-02-13 (Thu, 13 Feb 1997 12:11:16 -0800 (PST)) - N.Y. judge rules for Planned Parenthood in web site case - Vipul Ved Prakash <vipul@pobox.com>

New Thread? / Re: Apology from me to the list and TruthMonger

• 1997-08-11 (Mon, 11 Aug 1997 15:09:37 +0800) - New Thread? / Re: Apology from me to the list and TruthMonger - TruthMailer <tm@dev.null>
  • 1997-08-11 (Tue, 12 Aug 1997 00:30:21 +0800) - Distributing food without a license - Tim May <tcmay@got.net>
    • 1997-08-12 (Wed, 13 Aug 1997 04:17:21 +0800) - TCM goes to city council - “Vladimir Z. Nuri” <vznuri@netcom.com>
      • 1997-08-14 (Thu, 14 Aug 1997 08:08:54 +0800) - Re: TCM goes to city council - Vipul Ved Prakash <vipul@pobox.com>

Fuck the usenet cabal

• 1997-08-13 (Wed, 13 Aug 1997 11:19:09 +0800) - Fuck the usenet cabal - dlv@bwalk.dm.com (Dr.Dimitri Vulis KOTM)
  • 1997-08-13 (Wed, 13 Aug 1997 20:51:15 +0800) - Re: Fuck the usenet cabal - ? the Platypus {aka David Formosa} <dformosa@st.nepean.uws.edu.au>
    • 1997-08-13 (Wed, 13 Aug 1997 22:08:40 +0800) - Re: Fuck the usenet cabal - dlv@bwalk.dm.com (Dr.Dimitri Vulis KOTM)
      • 1997-08-13 (Thu, 14 Aug 1997 04:32:48 +0800) - Re: Fuck the usenet cabal - Ray Arachelian <sunder@brainlink.com>
        • 1997-08-14 (Thu, 14 Aug 1997 08:14:46 +0800) - Re: Fuck the usenet cabal - “William H. Geiger III” <whgiii@amaranth.com>
        • 1997-08-14 (Thu, 14 Aug 1997 08:28:35 +0800) - Re: Fuck the usenet cabal - Vipul Ved Prakash <vipul@pobox.com>
          • 1997-08-15 (Sat, 16 Aug 1997 01:04:30 +0800) - Bringing Adam Back for Trial - Tim May <tcmay@got.net>
            • 1997-08-15 (Sat, 16 Aug 1997 03:46:23 +0800) - Re: Bringing Adam Back for Trial - Adam Back <aba@dcs.ex.ac.uk>
        • 1997-08-14 (Thu, 14 Aug 1997 12:51:27 +0800) - Re: Fuck the usenet cabal - dlv@bwalk.dm.com (Dr.Dimitri Vulis KOTM)
          • 1997-08-14 (Thu, 14 Aug 1997 20:08:59 +0800) - PGP in < 100 lines of perl (was Re: Fuck the usenet cabal) - Adam Back <aba@dcs.ex.ac.uk>
          • 1997-08-15 (Fri, 15 Aug 1997 17:37:57 +0800) - Re: PGP in < 100 lines of perl - Bill Stewart <stewarts@ix.netcom.com>
        • 1997-08-14 (Thu, 14 Aug 1997 15:39:27 +0800) - Re: Fuck the usenet cabal - Mike <Michael.Johnson@mejl.com>
        • 1997-08-15 (Fri, 15 Aug 1997 17:24:15 +0800) - Re: Export rules - Bill Stewart <stewarts@ix.netcom.com>
  • 1997-08-13 (Thu, 14 Aug 1997 05:19:27 +0800) - Re: Fuck the usenet cabal - Ray Arachelian <sunder@brainlink.com>
    • 1997-08-14 (Thu, 14 Aug 1997 09:13:05 +0800) - Re: Fuck the usenet cabal - Adam Back <aba@dcs.ex.ac.uk>

RE: Katz, Wired, and Clueless Conferences on Cyberspace (fwd)

• 1997-08-21 (Thu, 21 Aug 1997 19:49:28 +0800) - RE: Katz, Wired, and Clueless Conferences on Cyberspace (fwd) - Vipul Ved Prakash <vipul@pobox.com>

3GW standards

• 1997-08-21 (Thu, 21 Aug 1997 20:25:10 +0800) - 3GW standards - Vipul Ved Prakash <vipul@pobox.com>

Re: Alex le Heux

• 1997-08-20 (Wed, 20 Aug 1997 22:15:51 +0800) - Re: Alex le Heux - Alex de Joode <adejoode@replay.com>
  • 1997-08-21 (Fri, 22 Aug 1997 03:17:26 +0800) - Re: Alex le Heux - Vipul Ved Prakash <vipul@pobox.com>

Re: The Real Bell Issue / Re: Bell, etc

• 1997-08-20 (Wed, 20 Aug 1997 15:14:49 +0800) - Re: The Real Bell Issue / Re: Bell, etc - nobody@REPLAY.COM (Anonymous)
  • 1997-08-20 (Thu, 21 Aug 1997 00:55:47 +0800) - An end to “court appointed attorneys” - Tim May <tcmay@got.net>
    • 1997-08-20 (Thu, 21 Aug 1997 01:42:51 +0800) - Re: An end to “court appointed attorneys” - Patrick Oonk <patrick@atro.pine.nl>
    • 1997-08-20 (Thu, 21 Aug 1997 01:55:29 +0800) - Re: An end to “court appointed attorneys” - Tim May <tcmay@got.net>
      • 1997-08-20 (Thu, 21 Aug 1997 03:12:53 +0800) - Re: An end to “court appointed attorneys” - Paul Pomes <ppomes@Qualcomm.com>
        • 1997-08-21 (Thu, 21 Aug 1997 10:49:25 +0800) - Re: An end to “court appointed attorneys” - frissell@panix.com
      • 1997-08-20 (Thu, 21 Aug 1997 03:21:33 +0800) - Re: An end to “court appointed attorneys” - Tim May <tcmay@got.net>
        • 1997-08-20 (Thu, 21 Aug 1997 04:25:17 +0800) - Re: An end to “court appointed attorneys” - Patrick Oonk <patrick@atro.pine.nl>
        • 1997-08-21 (Thu, 21 Aug 1997 11:52:54 +0800) - Re: An end to “court appointed attorneys” - Tim May <tcmay@got.net>
        • 1997-08-21 (Thu, 21 Aug 1997 13:37:22 +0800) - Re: An end to “court appointed attorneys” - Kent Crispin <kent@songbird.com>
          • 1997-08-21 (Fri, 22 Aug 1997 00:07:01 +0800) - Re: An end to “court appointed attorneys” - Ray Arachelian <sunder@brainlink.com>
          • 1997-08-21 (Fri, 22 Aug 1997 03:40:53 +0800) - Re: An end to “court appointed attorneys” - Vipul Ved Prakash <vipul@pobox.com>
          • 1997-08-22 (Fri, 22 Aug 1997 11:24:35 +0800) - Re: An end to “court appointed attorneys” - Kent Crispin <kent@songbird.com>
          • 1997-08-22 (Fri, 22 Aug 1997 14:13:21 +0800) - Re: An end to “court appointed attorneys” - Kent Crispin <kent@songbird.com>
            • 1997-08-23 (Sat, 23 Aug 1997 08:53:16 +0800) - lack of evolutionary pressures (was Re: An end to “court appointed attorneys”) - Adam Back <aba@dcs.ex.ac.uk>
            • 1997-08-23 (Sat, 23 Aug 1997 14:01:51 +0800) - Re: lack of evolutionary pressures (was Re: An end to “court appointed attorneys”) - Kent Crispin <kent@songbird.com>
              • 1997-08-23 (Sat, 23 Aug 1997 18:23:26 +0800) - Re: lack of evolutionary pressures (was Re: An end to “court appointed attorneys”) - Adam Back <aba@dcs.ex.ac.uk>
              • 1997-08-23 (Sat, 23 Aug 1997 20:38:12 +0800) - Re: lack of evolutionary pressures (was Re: An end to “court appointed attorneys”) - Lucky Green <shamrock@netcom.com>
              • 1997-08-23 (Sun, 24 Aug 1997 00:44:12 +0800) - Re: lack of evolutionary pressures (was Re: An end to “courtappointed attorneys”) - Bill Frantz <frantz@netcom.com>
                • 1997-08-24 (Mon, 25 Aug 1997 03:16:50 +0800) - Re: lack of evolutionary pressures (was Re: An end to “courtappointed attorneys”) - Adam Back <aba@dcs.ex.ac.uk>
              • 1997-08-23 (Sun, 24 Aug 1997 01:18:18 +0800) - Re: lack of evolutionary pressures - Tim May <tcmay@got.net>
                • 1997-08-24 (Mon, 25 Aug 1997 03:07:52 +0800) - Re: lack of evolutionary pressures - Adam Back <aba@dcs.ex.ac.uk>
                • 1997-08-25 (Mon, 25 Aug 1997 12:57:08 +0800) - Re: lack of evolutionary pressures - Bill Frantz <frantz@netcom.com>
              • 1997-08-24 (Sun, 24 Aug 1997 13:23:30 +0800) - Re: lack of evolutionary pressures (was Re: An end to “court appointed attorneys”) - Kent Crispin <kent@songbird.com>
                • 1997-08-24 (Mon, 25 Aug 1997 03:17:42 +0800) - Re: lack of evolutionary pressures (was Re: An end to “court appointed attorneys”) - Adam Back <aba@dcs.ex.ac.uk>
            • 1997-08-23 (Sun, 24 Aug 1997 04:34:28 +0800) - Re: An end to “court appointed attorneys” - Vipul Ved Prakash <vipul@pobox.com>

US DoC on anonymizer

• 1997-08-22 (Sat, 23 Aug 1997 04:32:57 +0800) - US DoC on anonymizer - 3umoelle@informatik.uni-hamburg.de (Ulf =?iso-8859-1?Q?M=F6ller?=)
  • 1997-08-23 (Sun, 24 Aug 1997 04:08:13 +0800) - Re: US DoC on anonymizer - Vipul Ved Prakash <vipul@pobox.com>

Study sees privacy lacking on government Web sites (fwd)

• 1997-08-27 (Thu, 28 Aug 1997 03:22:59 +0800) - Study sees privacy lacking on government Web sites (fwd) - Vipul Ved Prakash <vipul@pobox.com>

New service allows customers to track stolen PCs (fwd)

• 1997-08-28 (Fri, 29 Aug 1997 00:44:48 +0800) - New service allows customers to track stolen PCs (fwd) - Vipul Ved Prakash <vipul@pobox.com>

Encouraging News - France

• 1997-09-01 (Tue, 2 Sep 1997 01:24:15 +0800) - Encouraging News - France - “Brian B. Riley” <brianbr@together.net>
  • 1997-09-01 (Tue, 2 Sep 1997 02:24:50 +0800) - Re: Encouraging News - France - Tim May <tcmay@got.net>
    • 1997-09-01 (Tue, 2 Sep 1997 06:21:08 +0800) - false spin on French Crypto news (was Re: Encouraging News - France) - Adam Back <aba@dcs.ex.ac.uk>
      • 1997-09-05 (Fri, 5 Sep 1997 17:52:51 +0800) - Don’t ask for permission - Vipul Ved Prakash <vipul@pobox.com>
  • 1997-09-01 (Tue, 2 Sep 1997 05:33:30 +0800) - Re: Encouraging News - France - Fabrice Planchon <fabrice@math.Princeton.EDU>

[fwd][news] Netscape meets gov’t security standard

• 1997-09-12 (Fri, 12 Sep 1997 08:37:45 +0800) - [fwd][news] Netscape meets gov’t security standard - Vipul Ved Prakash <vipul@pobox.com>
  • 1997-09-12 (Sat, 13 Sep 1997 00:07:24 +0800) - Re: [fwd][news] Netscape meets gov’t security standard - Tom Weinstein <tomw@netscape.com>
    • 1997-09-12 (Sat, 13 Sep 1997 03:11:10 +0800) - Re: [fwd][news] Netscape meets gov’t security standard - “William H. Geiger III” <whgiii@invweb.net>
      • 1997-09-12 (Sat, 13 Sep 1997 03:12:55 +0800) - Re: [fwd][news] Netscape meets gov’t security standard - Tom Weinstein <tomw@netscape.com>
        • 1997-09-12 (Sat, 13 Sep 1997 03:35:36 +0800) - Re: [fwd][news] Netscape meets gov’t security standard - “William H. Geiger III” <whgiii@invweb.net>