1996-08-21 - Re: Spamming (Good or Bad?)

Header Data

From: Rich Graves <rich@c2.org>
To: Vipul Ved Prakash <vipul@pobox.com>
Message Hash: 4e661f31dbcb6eddfc91b8c63ac6d1fa17dc0dcb96edbf97a5598173c00159b9
Message ID: <Pine.GUL.3.95.960820180602.11228H-100000@Networking.Stanford.EDU>
Reply To: <199608210407.EAA00568@fountainhead.net>
UTC Datetime: 1996-08-21 05:05:31 UTC
Raw Date: Wed, 21 Aug 1996 13:05:31 +0800

Raw message

From: Rich Graves <rich@c2.org>
Date: Wed, 21 Aug 1996 13:05:31 +0800
To: Vipul Ved Prakash <vipul@pobox.com>
Subject: Re: Spamming (Good or Bad?)
In-Reply-To: <199608210407.EAA00568@fountainhead.net>
Message-ID: <Pine.GUL.3.95.960820180602.11228H-100000@Networking.Stanford.EDU>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


On Wed, 21 Aug 1996, Vipul Ved Prakash wrote:

> I don't know if there has been much discussion on the ethics of spamming
> here? Is spamming free speech? 

Yes.

So is mailbombing the motherfucker, or more productively, virtually
picketing his ISP until they kick him off for net abuse.

Ethically? We don't talk ethics much here, but I'd say it's highly unethical
to abuse a service paid for by the pooled resources of many. 

-rich






Thread