1996-08-21 - Spamming (Good or Bad?)
Header Data
From: Vipul Ved Prakash <vipul@pobox.com>
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: 97820eda44786e333a810e73c20613635060d74ab01a2c13a763950c330acccf
Message ID: <199608210407.EAA00568@fountainhead.net>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1996-08-21 01:00:53 UTC
Raw Date: Wed, 21 Aug 1996 09:00:53 +0800
Raw message
From: Vipul Ved Prakash <vipul@pobox.com>
Date: Wed, 21 Aug 1996 09:00:53 +0800
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Spamming (Good or Bad?)
Message-ID: <199608210407.EAA00568@fountainhead.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text
I don't know if there has been much discussion on the ethics of spamming
here? Is spamming free speech?
- Vipul
Thread
Return to August 1996
- Return to “Jim Gillogly <jim@acm.org>”
- Return to “Rich Graves <rich@c2.org>”
Return to “Vipul Ved Prakash <vipul@pobox.com>”
- 1996-08-21 (Wed, 21 Aug 1996 09:00:53 +0800) - Spamming (Good or Bad?) - Vipul Ved Prakash <vipul@pobox.com>
- 1996-08-21 (Wed, 21 Aug 1996 12:20:31 +0800) - Re: Spamming (Good or Bad?) - Jim Gillogly <jim@acm.org>
- 1996-08-21 (Wed, 21 Aug 1996 13:05:31 +0800) - Re: Spamming (Good or Bad?) - Rich Graves <rich@c2.org>