1997-08-20 - Re: An end to “court appointed attorneys”

Header Data

From: Patrick Oonk <patrick@atro.pine.nl>
To: tcmay@got.net (Tim May)
Message Hash: 151f630aa4554bc29ac9385e09fcb82f0c38ceefa57a5303a4c247b7f973ea8a
Message ID: <199708201735.TAA08719@atro.pine.nl>
Reply To: <v03102800b020ce21f94c@[207.167.93.63]>
UTC Datetime: 1997-08-20 17:42:51 UTC
Raw Date: Thu, 21 Aug 1997 01:42:51 +0800

Raw message

From: Patrick Oonk <patrick@atro.pine.nl>
Date: Thu, 21 Aug 1997 01:42:51 +0800
To: tcmay@got.net (Tim May)
Subject: Re: An end to "court appointed attorneys"
In-Reply-To: <v03102800b020ce21f94c@[207.167.93.63]>
Message-ID: <199708201735.TAA08719@atro.pine.nl>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain



> First off, I don't believe _anyone_ should ever have a "court-appointed
> attorney." We don't believe people should get state-subsidized food, or
> shelter, or medical care, and so on....or at least most of us don't. So why
> the big exception for hiring attorneys?

Maybe for the simple reason that some people might not have the money to
defend themselves ?

-- 
| Patrick Oonk -    http://patrick.mypage.org/  - patrick@pine.nl |
| PGP Key ID 0xDA2E93FA   -   Internic PO59   -   <clicketyclick> |
| Pine Internet B.V.           Consultancy, installatie en beheer |
| Tel: +31-70-3111010 - Fax: +31-70-3111011 - http://www.pine.nl/ |






Thread