1997-08-14 - Re: Fuck the usenet cabal

Header Data

From: Vipul Ved Prakash <vipul@pobox.com>
To: sunder@brainlink.com
Message Hash: 80635da7b85fb8ffbc35181fc5d50da6177ed632674505979636a818d3056342
Message ID: <199708140535.FAA01661@fountainhead.net>
Reply To: <Pine.SUN.3.96.970813161558.7599O-100000@beast.brainlink.com>
UTC Datetime: 1997-08-14 00:28:35 UTC
Raw Date: Thu, 14 Aug 1997 08:28:35 +0800

Raw message

From: Vipul Ved Prakash <vipul@pobox.com>
Date: Thu, 14 Aug 1997 08:28:35 +0800
To: sunder@brainlink.com
Subject: Re: Fuck the usenet cabal
In-Reply-To: <Pine.SUN.3.96.970813161558.7599O-100000@beast.brainlink.com>
Message-ID: <199708140535.FAA01661@fountainhead.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----

Ray Arachelian wrote:

> On Wed, 13 Aug 1997, Dr.Dimitri Vulis KOTM wrote:

> > What if a non-US person paid them $40 to spam people outside the U.S.
> > with strong crypto?
> > 
> > Is it possible to stuff a blatant ITAR violation into about 100 lines of ascii?

> Already been done.  RSA in 4 lines of Perl, etc...  Heck there was even a
> site out that that cut a UUENCODED copy of PGP into many bits and asked

Is RSA in 3 lines of PERL an ITAR violation? Its more like "meta" code for bc
todo RSA. adam?

- -- 

Vipul Ved Prakash                 | - Electronic Security & Crypto 
vipul@pobox.com 	          | - Web Objects 
91 11 2233328                     | - PERL Development 
198 Madhuban IP Extension         | - Linux & Open Systems 
Delhi, INDIA 110 092              | - Networked Virtual Spaces

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: 2.6.2i

iQCVAwUBM/KZHvfccPDXGRjVAQEIxgP/Y6SXfAnz8wu5g6k1a2ZBoDtbq5qifjzL
ENNZBEx4ncd20o2kx71mvUEcpfkiZ3XWxKQWHMgji28Av9XQa+TU1BtEY5jjShV4
YSdjQgerzCMDdr2stvIbfFwUaIYxwn1tjUkvle2wMmGDK4NDUf6iXFOa5jFtn1aZ
bvjO2iZTlKg=
=Ro2S
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----






Thread