1996-08-16 - Billy boy’s satellites [Was - Floating DataHaven]

Header Data

From: Gary Howland <gary@systemics.com>
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: 041129f21e96fded9c58fa7cd0761d574fc4872d9323edb48dfad9d210ec204d
Message ID: <321446BF.20431CA7@systemics.com>
Reply To: <Pine.LNX.3.91.960815194218.16207H-100000@offshore>
UTC Datetime: 1996-08-16 12:47:45 UTC
Raw Date: Fri, 16 Aug 1996 20:47:45 +0800

Raw message

From: Gary Howland <gary@systemics.com>
Date: Fri, 16 Aug 1996 20:47:45 +0800
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Billy boy's satellites [Was - Floating DataHaven]
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.3.91.960815194218.16207H-100000@offshore>
Message-ID: <321446BF.20431CA7@systemics.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


Vincent Cate wrote:
 
> You can get Internet via radio links for reasonable prices.  And via
> satellite for almost affordable prices.  When Bill Gates 900 satellites
> get up there it should be very affordable.

... if a tad unrealiable?

The thought of 900 satelites in low orbit, all running NT, makes me
shudder.  Brings a new meaning to the expression "OS crash".

What are cypherpunks thoughts on this?  Who really believes it'll work?

Doesn't the low orbit part mean that the satellites will have a low life
expectancy, meaning a new launch every couple of days? (where's Gerald
Bull when you need him - oh yes, now I remember ...)

Gary
--
pub  1024/C001D00D 1996/01/22  Gary Howland <gary@systemics.com>
Key fingerprint =  0C FB 60 61 4D 3B 24 7D  1C 89 1D BE 1F EE 09 06 
^S
^A^Aoft FAT filesytem is extremely robust, ^Mrarely suffering from^T^T





Thread