From: Gary Howland <gary@systemics.com>
Date: Wed, 11 Sep 1996 19:40:23 +0800
To: Greg Broiles <gbroiles@netbox.com>
Subject: Re: TWA 800 - Serious thread.
In-Reply-To: <2.2.32.19960910190024.007245e4@pop.ricochet.net>
Message-ID: <32367F80.41C67EA6@systemics.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


Greg Broiles wrote:
> 
> At 03:30 PM 9/9/96 -0700, Dale Thorn wrote:
> 
> >If govt. protects its "sources and methods", however nefarious, to the
> >extent that the public is never asked to assent to these methods (even
> >though a few of us know about them anyway), then the public doesn't have
> >to become overtly cynical about what's going on.
> 
> But the public *is* asked to assent to those methods - your chance to vote
> on them is known colloquially as "jury duty".

Ah, but isn't "jury selection" the process of selecting those that don't
know they are judging the law as well as the case?

Gary
--
"Of course the US Constitution isn't perfect; but it's a lot better
than what we have now."  -- Unknown.

pub  1024/C001D00D 1996/01/22  Gary Howland <gary@systemics.com>
Key fingerprint =  0C FB 60 61 4D 3B 24 7D  1C 89 1D BE 1F EE 09 06