1996-09-10 - Re: TWA 800 - Serious thread.

Header Data

From: Greg Broiles <gbroiles@netbox.com>
To: Dale Thorn <dthorn@gte.net>
Message Hash: 470a32426d7c98eadffa322f5d3d8f3495ad6ce54fbf0218ec58f9b4960d3443
Message ID: <2.2.32.19960910190024.007245e4@pop.ricochet.net>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1996-09-10 23:31:17 UTC
Raw Date: Wed, 11 Sep 1996 07:31:17 +0800

Raw message

From: Greg Broiles <gbroiles@netbox.com>
Date: Wed, 11 Sep 1996 07:31:17 +0800
To: Dale Thorn <dthorn@gte.net>
Subject: Re: TWA 800 - Serious thread.
Message-ID: <2.2.32.19960910190024.007245e4@pop.ricochet.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


At 03:30 PM 9/9/96 -0700, Dale Thorn wrote:

>If govt. protects its "sources and methods", however nefarious, to the 
>extent that the public is never asked to assent to these methods (even 
>though a few of us know about them anyway), then the public doesn't have 
>to become overtly cynical about what's going on.

But the public *is* asked to assent to those methods - your chance to vote
on them is known colloquially as "jury duty". 
--
Greg Broiles                |"Post-rotational nystagmus was the subject of
gbroiles@netbox.com         |an in-court demonstration by the People
http://www.io.com/~gbroiles |wherein Sgt Page was spun around by Sgt
                            |Studdard." People v. Quinn 580 NYS2d 818,825.






Thread