From: ichudov@algebra.com (Igor Chudov @ home)
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: 24c642758d3d7c6aad74d4ffcc91bea89e9256c4bd222aca68cc6f3e87ac7dbf
Message ID: <199609012217.RAA00801@manifold.algebra.com>
Reply To: <Pine.LNX.3.95.960901161500.520A-100000@gak>
UTC Datetime: 1996-09-02 00:11:15 UTC
Raw Date: Mon, 2 Sep 1996 08:11:15 +0800
From: ichudov@algebra.com (Igor Chudov @ home)
Date: Mon, 2 Sep 1996 08:11:15 +0800
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Re: It is good that anon.penet.fi has been closed!
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.3.95.960901161500.520A-100000@gak>
Message-ID: <199609012217.RAA00801@manifold.algebra.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text
Mark M. wrote:
> On Sun, 1 Sep 1996, Igor Chudov @ home wrote:
> > Yes, subject says it all. anon.penet.fi was a whole lot worse than
> > cypherpunks remailers. It provided clueless users with no real security,
>
> It also provided anonymity to many people who needed it. I think that many
> people who need anonymity will probably just learn faking mail and news
> headers. Many people just don't want to deal with cpunk remailers. OTOH, I
> agree that this might actually force many people with Penet addresses to learn
> about more secure remailers. In this way, the closing of anon.penet.fi could
> be looked upon as a Good Thing. However, as long as there is no easy way for
> Windoze and Mac users to use secure remailers, users will sooner resort to
> fake-mailing then learning how to use cpunk remailers. People that need a
> pseudonym address to use on various support groups can get them from other,
> equally insecure, remailers.
I believe that Private Idaho is a cypherpunks remailer client for Windows.
- Igor.
Return to September 1996
Return to “qut@netcom.com (Dave Harman OBC)”