From: “Douglas R. Floyd” <dfloyd@io.com>
To: jf_avon@citenet.net
Message Hash: 257c093fcb7bb67187d24e1a5394395502f23c73e36c5499747dd50085265307
Message ID: <199609042131.QAA02995@xanadu.io.com>
Reply To: <9609041639.AA25461@cti02.citenet.net>
UTC Datetime: 1996-09-05 00:55:30 UTC
Raw Date: Thu, 5 Sep 1996 08:55:30 +0800
From: "Douglas R. Floyd" <dfloyd@io.com>
Date: Thu, 5 Sep 1996 08:55:30 +0800
To: jf_avon@citenet.net
Subject: Re: Letter to the Observer [re: Internet paedophile]
In-Reply-To: <9609041639.AA25461@cti02.citenet.net>
Message-ID: <199609042131.QAA02995@xanadu.io.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
>
> On 4 Sep 96 at 5:41, Martin Minow wrote:
>
> > Forwarded to me by a friend:
>
> > The following letters were delivered to the Editor of the Observer
> > last week as a request to publish a retraction of their article
> > relating to the Internet that appeared on Sunday 25th. August.
>
> One way to limit or retaliate against diffamation would be to refuse
> internet access to anybody known to be part of any such medias, being
> tv or paper.
>
> ISPs would probably easily agree since the revenues coming from
> journalists vs from the general population is probably minuscule. Of
> course, the conventionnal media would set up their own ISP but they
> could be identified.
>
> Does that makes sense or am I out to lunch?
AOL will take them. Most of them are on there anyway.
>
> jfa
>
> Jean-Francois Avon
> DePompadour, Societe d'Importation Ltee; Limoges porcelain, silverware and crystal
> JFA Technologies, R&D consultants: physicists, technologists and engineers.
>
> PGP keys at: http://w3.citenet.net/users/jf_avon
> ID# C58ADD0D : 529645E8205A8A5E F87CC86FAEFEF891
>
>
Return to September 1996
Return to ““Jean-Francois Avon” <jf_avon@citenet.net>”