1996-09-25 - Re: Hallam-Baker demands more repudiations or he’ll write!

Header Data

From: “Jean-Francois Avon” <jf_avon@citenet.net>
To: jim bell <bdavis@thepoint.net>
Message Hash: 45c02047cff36b72fc083a2a19632155737df14fd2b34e69b337091b20d8db39
Message ID: <9609251433.AB02026@cti02.citenet.net>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1996-09-25 19:36:04 UTC
Raw Date: Thu, 26 Sep 1996 03:36:04 +0800

Raw message

From: "Jean-Francois Avon" <jf_avon@citenet.net>
Date: Thu, 26 Sep 1996 03:36:04 +0800
To: jim bell <bdavis@thepoint.net>
Subject: Re: Hallam-Baker demands more repudiations or he'll write!
Message-ID: <9609251433.AB02026@cti02.citenet.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


On 25 Sep 96 at 5:59, Brian Davis wrote:

> I disagree that that will be the response, but you should be willing
> to allow one group of people to fight fire with fire.

But generally, it has been found a much better solution to fight fire
with water, and this is why I am not convinced of the ideological 
effectiveness of AP, although I don't doubt it's operationnal 
effectiveness at all.

I will take that sentence only slightly out-of-(specific)-context and
make a still pertinent remark about it:
  	
	This is *exactly* what Jim Bell, because of his opinions,
	envision to do with the AP system.


I find that absolutely hilarious!

jfa

Please reply by e-mail since I am not on Cypherpunks anymore.





Thread