From: “Jean-Francois Avon” <jf_avon@citenet.net>
To: jim bell <bdavis@thepoint.net>
Message Hash: 45c02047cff36b72fc083a2a19632155737df14fd2b34e69b337091b20d8db39
Message ID: <9609251433.AB02026@cti02.citenet.net>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1996-09-25 19:36:04 UTC
Raw Date: Thu, 26 Sep 1996 03:36:04 +0800
From: "Jean-Francois Avon" <jf_avon@citenet.net>
Date: Thu, 26 Sep 1996 03:36:04 +0800
To: jim bell <bdavis@thepoint.net>
Subject: Re: Hallam-Baker demands more repudiations or he'll write!
Message-ID: <9609251433.AB02026@cti02.citenet.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
On 25 Sep 96 at 5:59, Brian Davis wrote:
> I disagree that that will be the response, but you should be willing
> to allow one group of people to fight fire with fire.
But generally, it has been found a much better solution to fight fire
with water, and this is why I am not convinced of the ideological
effectiveness of AP, although I don't doubt it's operationnal
effectiveness at all.
I will take that sentence only slightly out-of-(specific)-context and
make a still pertinent remark about it:
This is *exactly* what Jim Bell, because of his opinions,
envision to do with the AP system.
I find that absolutely hilarious!
jfa
Please reply by e-mail since I am not on Cypherpunks anymore.
Return to September 1996
Return to “snow <snow@smoke.suba.com>”