From: Declan McCullagh <declan@eff.org>
Date: Sun, 8 Sep 1996 06:04:23 +0800
To: Damaged Justice <frogfarm@yakko.cs.wmich.edu>
Subject: Re: Court challenge to AOL junk-mail blocks
In-Reply-To: <199609070316.XAA13685@yakko.cs.wmich.edu>
Message-ID: <Pine.SUN.3.91.960907122225.13569J-100000@eff.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


If AOL wants to stop spammers, let them. They have every right to do so as
long as their agreement with their customers permits it. It's a matter of
contract law between AOL and its customers and should not involve the
spammers and a lawsuit brought by the spammers.

It seems as though the judge was snookered by the spammers' claim of U.S. 
Mail-like service, free speech, blah. The right to free speech does 
extend to corporations; in that way, it includes the right *not* to speak.

-Declan


On Fri, 6 Sep 1996, Damaged Justice wrote:

> 
> This is utter horseshit. AOL, like any private individual or organization,
> has the right to refuse service to anyone at any time for any reason, or
> even for no reason at all. The gubmint isn't doing SQUAT, except forcing
> AOL to allow the spammers access.
> 
> --
> http://yakko.cs.wmich.edu/~frogfarm ...for the best in unapproved information
>       Hey, Bill Clinton: You suck, and those boys died! I hope you die!
>  I feel a groove comin' on             $              Freedom...yeah, right.
>  
> 


// declan@eff.org // I do not represent the EFF // declan@well.com //