1996-09-18 - Re: Snake-Oil FAQ

Header Data

From: Dale Thorn <dthorn@gte.net>
To: Krenn <krenn@nym.alias.net>
Message Hash: a0ed6f77d6abd532b5cd18e51f753259f8c853921ee0568d51b9d37a20b54912
Message ID: <323FAF89.651F@gte.net>
Reply To: <199609180001.UAA24489@anon.lcs.mit.edu>
UTC Datetime: 1996-09-18 11:27:52 UTC
Raw Date: Wed, 18 Sep 1996 19:27:52 +0800

Raw message

From: Dale Thorn <dthorn@gte.net>
Date: Wed, 18 Sep 1996 19:27:52 +0800
To: Krenn <krenn@nym.alias.net>
Subject: Re: Snake-Oil FAQ
In-Reply-To: <199609180001.UAA24489@anon.lcs.mit.edu>
Message-ID: <323FAF89.651F@gte.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


Krenn wrote:
> It would be nice to have a list of actual products which are deemed
> potential snake-oil. Such a list could be maintained anonymously
> through a nym to avoid all the annoying legal problems with commenting
> on another's product. Though truth is the best defense against libel
> charges, it would be very annoying to be sued or some such by some
> hairbrained snake-oil peddler.

Think how much more annoying it would be if the shoe were on the other 
foot.






Thread